PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1981American Journal of Political Science143 citations

A New Approach to the Spatial Theory of Electoral Competition

View Full Paper
MHMelvin J. HinichWPWalker Pollard

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In his unidimensional model of electoral competition, Downs argues that voters use party ideology as an informational short cut for forecasting the policies that a party will pursue if elected. Parties are perceived by voters as points on an ideological axis. In the Davis-Hinich multidimensional model, on the other hand, the axes are real issues, and the principal actors are politicians who are modeled as points in the multi-issue space. This paper reformulates spatial voting theory in terms of a model that connects what we call predictive dimensions with political issues that are salient during a given election campaign. This model is both a synthesis and an extension of the Downs and Davis-Hinich spatial models. We obtain a median voter result for one predictive dimension that is similar to the Downs result but with important differences. We also obtain results showing the electoral advantage of incumbency and the tendency for incremental change when there is a great deal of heterogeneity in voter perceptions about the candidates.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hinich et al. (1981) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69deab3340ea0656795590e7https://doi.org/10.2307/2110856
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper