PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2017Energy & Environmental Science382 citationsOpen Access

Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions?

MFMathilde FajardyNDNiall Mac Dowell

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Negative emissions technologies (NETs) in general and bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage (BECCS) in particular are commonly regarded as vital yet controversial to meeting our climate goals. In this contribution we show how the sustainability and carbon efficiency, or otherwise, of BECCS depends entirely on the choices made throughout the BECCS supply chain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fajardy et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69debc27499d77a496b0ca63https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee00465f
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Absorber modeling for NGCC carbon capture with aqueous piperazine2016 · 32 citations
  2. 2Shell Cansolv CO2 capture technology: Achievement from First Commercial Plant2014 · 141 citations
  3. 3Investigation of slagging in pulverized fuel co-combustion of biomass and coal at a pilot-scale test facility1998 · 119 citations
  4. 4Reducing CO2 emissions by substituting biomass for fossil fuels1995 · 236 citations
  5. 5ORECCL - Summary of a national database on energy crop landbase, yields, and costs1997 · 8 citations