PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 4, 2013Journal of Environmental Quality244 citations

Ammonia Volatilization and Nitrogen Retention: How Deep to Incorporate Urea?

View Full Paper
PRPhilippe RochetteDADenis A. AngersMCMartin H. Chantigny

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Incorporation of urea decreases ammonia (NH) volatilization, but field measurements are needed to better quantify the impact of placement depth. In this study, we measured the volatilization losses after banding of urea at depths of 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 cm in a slightly acidic (pH 6) silt loam soil using wind tunnels. Mineral nitrogen (N) concentration and pH were measured in the top 2 cm of soil to determine the extent of urea N migration and the influence of placement depth on the availability of ammoniacal N for volatilization near the soil surface. Ammonia volatilization losses were 50% of applied N when urea was banded at the surface, and incorporation of the band decreased emissions by an average of 7% cm (14% cm when expressed as a percentage of losses after surface banding). Incorporating urea at depths >7.5 cm therefore resulted in negligible NH emissions and maximum N retention. Cumulative losses increased exponentially with increasing maximum NH-N and pH values measured in the surface soil during the experiment. However, temporal variations in these soil properties were poorly related to the temporal variations in NH emission rates, likely as a result of interactions with other factors (e.g., water content and NH-N adsorption) on, and fixation by, soil particles. Laboratory and field volatilization data from the literature were summarized and used to determine a relationship between NH losses and depth of urea incorporation. When emissions were expressed as a percentage of losses for a surface application, the mean reduction after urea incorporation was approximately 12.5% cm. Although we agree that the efficiency of urea incorporation to reduce NH losses varies depending on several soil properties, management practices, and climatic conditions, we propose that this value represents an estimate of the mean impact of incorporation depth that could be used when site-specific information is unavailable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rochette et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dec3ae1d9bba5129b0cc5bhttps://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.05.0192
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nitrogen losses by volatilization in a corn crop with two tillage systems in the Argentine Pampa1998 · 45 citations
  2. 2Simulation Model of Banded Ammonia in Soils1990 · 15 citations
  3. 3Factors Affecting Urea Hydrolysis and Ammonia Volatilization in Soil1967 · 153 citations
  4. 4Effect of Environmental Factors on Ammonia Volatilization from a Urea‐Fertilized Soil1985 · 219 citations
  5. 5The Effects of Several Factors on Volatilization of Ammonia Formed from Urea in the Soil1960 · 290 citations