PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2014SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología429 citationsOpen Access

Statistical normalization techniques for magnetic resonance imaging

View Full Paper
RSRussell T. ShinoharaESElizabeth SweeneyJGJeff Goldsmith

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

While computed tomography and other imaging techniques are measured in absolute units with physical meaning, magnetic resonance images are expressed in arbitrary units that are difficult to interpret and differ between study visits and subjects. Much work in the image processing literature on intensity normalization has focused on histogram matching and other histogram mapping techniques, with little emphasis on normalizing images to have biologically interpretable units. Furthermore, there are no formalized principles or goals for the crucial comparability of image intensities within and across subjects. To address this, we propose a set of criteria necessary for the normalization of images. We further propose simple and robust biologically motivated normalization techniques for multisequence brain imaging that have the same interpretation across acquisitions and satisfy the proposed criteria. We compare the performance of different normalization methods in thousands of images of patients with Alzheimer's disease, hundreds of patients with multiple sclerosis, and hundreds of healthy subjects obtained in several different studies at dozens of imaging centers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shinohara et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dee32692a5e9426ae93bf0https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper