PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 6, 2016Circulation162 citationsOpen Access

Long-Term Outcomes of the Ross Procedure Versus Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement

View Full Paper
AMAmine MazineTDTirone E. DavidVRVivek Rao

Structured PICO

Does the Ross procedure improve long-term outcomes compared to mechanical aortic valve replacement in young and middle-aged adults?

P
Population
Young and middle-aged adults undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR)
I
Intervention
Ross procedure
C
Comparator
Mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR)
O
Outcome
Long-term survival and freedom from reinterventionhard clinical

The Ross procedure offers comparable long-term survival to mechanical AVR but with significantly lower risks of cardiac mortality, stroke, and major bleeding, making it an excellent option for young and middle-aged adults.

Abstract

Long-term survival and freedom from reintervention were comparable between the Ross procedure and mechanical AVR. However, the Ross procedure was associated with improved freedom from cardiac- and valve-related mortality and a significant reduction in the incidence of stroke and major bleeding. In specialized centers, the Ross procedure represents an excellent option and should be considered for young and middle-aged adults undergoing AVR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mazine et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df178fd85e58e37b7a1338https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.022800
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper