PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2001The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science184 citations

Venetian Sea Levels, British Bread Prices, and the Principle of the Common Cause

View Full Paper
ESElliott Sober

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

When two causally independent processes each have a quantity that increases monotonically (either deterministically or in probabilistic expectation), the two quantities will be correlated, thus providing a counterexample to Reichenbach's principle of the common cause. Several philosophers have denied this, but I argue that their efforts to save the principle are unsuccessful. Still, one salvage attempt does suggest a weaker principle that avoids the initial counterexample. However, even this weakened principle is mistaken, as can be seen by exploring the concepts of homology and homoplasy used in evolutionary biology. I argue that the kernel of truth in the principle of the common cause is to be found by separating metaphysical and epistemological issues; as far as the epistemology is concerned, the Likelihood Principle is central.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elliott Sober (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df21d2acbf09c32e6142e0https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/52.2.331
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper