PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Journal of Forecasting0 citations

Enhancing Financial Tail Risk Forecasting: A Blending Ensemble Framework for Nonlinear Expectile Regression

View Full Paper
YMYaolan MaYZYingying Zhang

Key Points

  • The main aim is to improve tail risk forecasting using a blending ensemble framework for expectile regression.
  • Developed a nonlinear expectile regression model using an ensemble of various machine learning techniques.
  • Integrated neural networks, support vector machines, XGBoost, LightGBM, and random forests.
  • Conducted Monte Carlo simulations to assess performance and robustness in finite samples.
  • Applied the model to Chinese stock indices for empirical validation.
  • The ensemble model outperforms traditional linear methods and individual machine learning models in EVaR forecasting.
  • Performance improvements are statistically significant under stochastic volatility and TGARCH settings.
  • SHAP analysis indicates that XGBoost and LightGBM are the most influential models in the ensemble.

Abstract

ABSTRACT As a prominent tool for tail risk measurement, expectile‐based value at risk (EVaR) has attracted growing interest due to its sensitivity to extreme risks. Existing approaches face two principal challenges: the inefficiency of conventional models under finite samples and the tendency of single machine learning models toward overfitting or underfitting. This paper introduces a nonlinear expectile regression model based on a blending ensemble framework, integrating neural networks, support vector machines, XGBoost, LightGBM, and random forests as base learners, with an expectile regression forest as the metalearner. Monte Carlo simulations confirm the method's robustness in finite samples. Applied to Chinese stock indices, the model outperforms both traditional linear specifications and each individual machine learning model in EVaR forecasting. Performance gains are statistically significant under stochastic volatility and TGARCH settings, as verified by Diebold–Mariano and Giacomini–White tests. SHAP analysis further shows that XGBoost and LightGBM contribute most to prediction, enhancing interpretability and offering insight into ensemble decision mechanisms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2b2ce4eeef8a2a6b02b5https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70154
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper