PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026PeerJ3 citationsOpen Access

Subtype-specific heterogeneity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in breast cancer: current insights and future directions

BGBiyao GongJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese MedicineLZLixiang ZhengJiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the roles and distribution of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in various breast cancer subtypes and their implications for therapy.
  • Synthesized recent advances on myeloid-derived suppressor cell programs.
  • Analyzed subtype-associated differences across TNBC, HER2+, and HR+/Luminal.
  • Summarized single-cell and spatial omics approaches for classification and mapping.
  • Outlined therapeutic strategies targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells.
  • Described critical roles of MDSCs in immune evasion and therapy resistance.
  • Highlighted limited insights on MDSC distribution in non-TNBC subtypes.
  • Identified strategies for improving therapeutic outcomes by targeting MDSCs.

Abstract

Breast cancer remains the most prevalent malignancy among women worldwide, and its molecular subtypes display marked differences in clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses. Increasing evidence highlights the critical roles of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) within the tumor microenvironment, where they orchestrate immune evasion, promote metastasis, and contribute to therapy resistance. However, most current studies primarily focus on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), while systematic insights into the abundance, subset distribution, and functional heterogeneity of MDSCs in Luminal and HER2 + subtypes remain limited. This review synthesizes recent advances on major MDSC programs and highlights subtype-associated differences in their distribution patterns, immunosuppressive mechanisms, and clinical relevance across TNBC, HER2 + , and HR + /Luminal breast cancer. We further discuss how these subtype-linked myeloid states may influence key therapeutic outcomes, including pathological complete response following neoadjuvant therapy, heterogeneity of benefit from immunotherapy-based combinations, and the emergence of treatment resistance. In addition, we summarize emerging single-cell and spatial omics approaches that refine MDSC classification and enable in situ mapping of myeloid–lymphocyte organization. Finally, we outline mechanism-guided therapeutic strategies targeting MDSCs—encompassing recruitment/trafficking blockade, inhibition of suppressive metabolic effector pathways, and myeloid ecosystem remodeling/reprogramming—to support subtype-tailored precision immunotherapy in breast cancer. This review is intended for researchers in tumor immunology and cancer biology, clinicians and translational medicine professionals, as well as graduate students or early-career scholars interested in immunosuppressive cells and breast cancer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2b65e4eeef8a2a6b0629https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20937
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries2021 · 114,179 citations
  2. 2Anti-HER2/Neu Antibody Therapy Inhibits HER2 + Breast Cancer by Blocking Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Activity2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3ΔNp63 regulates MDSC survival and metabolism in triple-negative breast cancer2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Breaking immune evasion in breast cancer by targeting COX-2/PGE2 pathway2025 · 13 citations
  5. 5Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries2024 · 25,401 citations