PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2019SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología325 citationsOpen Access

Cardiovascular Disease and the Female Disadvantage

MWMark Woodward

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Age-standardised rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are substantially higher in men than women. This explains why CVD has traditionally been seen as a "man's problem". However, CVD is the leading cause of death in women, worldwide, and is one of the most common causes of disability-adjusted life-years lost. In general, this is under-recognised and, in several ways, women are disadvantaged in terms of CVD. Both in primary and secondary prevention, there is evidence that women are undertreated, compared to men. Women often experience heart disease in a different way compared to men, and lack of recognition of this has been shown to have adverse consequences. Female patients of male cardiac physicians have been found to have worse outcomes than their male counterparts, with no such gender differential for female cardiologists. Clinical trials in CVD primarily recruit male patients, yet, it is well recognised that some drugs act differently in women and men. Diabetes and smoking, and perhaps other risk factors, confer a greater proportional excess cardiovascular risk to women than to men, whilst adverse pregnancies and factors concerned with the female reproductive cycle give women added vulnerability to CVD. However, women's health research is skewed towards mother and child health, an area where, arguably, the greatest public health gains have already been made, and breast cancer. Hence there is a need to redefine what is meant by "women's health" to encompass the whole lifecycle, with a stronger emphasis on CVD and other non-communicable diseases. Sex-specific analyses of research data should be the norm, whenever feasible.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mark Woodward (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2bc558b92af24d7a1226https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071165
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Women’s reproductive factors and incident cardiovascular disease in the UK Biobank2018 · 238 citations
  2. 2Implicit Gender Bias and the Use of Cardiovascular Tests Among Cardiologists2017 · 153 citations
  3. 3Transition between hospital and community care for patients with coronary heart disease: New South Wales and Victoria 2012–20152018 · 15 citations
  4. 4Myth and paradox of coronary risk and the menopause1998 · 178 citations
  5. 5Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies2011 · 925 citations