PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Journal of Hematology & Oncology3 citationsOpen Access

CAR-T therapy moving to first-line in multiple myeloma: latest updates from the 2025 ASH annual meeting

CGChuanying GengWCWenming ChenHZHong-Hu Zhu

Key Points

  • To evaluate the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in treating multiple myeloma compared to standard care.
  • Pivotal trials presented at the 2025 ASH Annual Meeting
  • Subgroup analysis of older patients (≥ 70 years) in KarMMa-3
  • Evaluation of overall response rate and progression-free survival in trials
  • Comparison of CAR-T therapy outcomes with standard care
  • KarMMa-3 reported an overall response rate of 81.6% vs. 48.1% for standard care
  • Median progression-free survival in KarMMa-3 was 18.9 months vs. 5.7 months
  • CARTITUDE-4 showed a 30-month progression-free survival of 71.0% vs. 43.2%
  • iMMagine-1 reported an overall response rate of 97% with 93% minimal residual disease negativity
  • Frontline CAR-T studies achieved up to 100% overall response rate and complete response rates near 94–97%

Abstract

CAR-T therapy is rapidly reshaping the treatment paradigm of multiple myeloma (MM). At the 2025 ASH Annual Meeting, pivotal trials demonstrated marked efficacy across both relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed settings. In KarMMa-3, a subgroup analysis of older patients (≥ 70 years) showed idecabtagene vicleucel significantly improved outcomes versus standard care: overall response rate (ORR) 81.6% vs. 48.1%, median progression-free survival (PFS) 18.9 vs. 5.7 months, with median overall survival (OS) not reached in either arm. CARTITUDE-4 showed superior 30-month PFS (71.0% vs. 43.2%), while iMMagine-1 reported an ORR of 97% with 93% minimal residual disease negativity. Notably, frontline CAR-T studies achieved unprecedented outcomes, including 100% ORR, stringent complete response rates approaching 94–97%, and 30-month PFS and OS rates of 88–92%. Together, these data support a paradigm shift toward earlier integration of CAR-T therapy in MM management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Geng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2bcae4eeef8a2a6b0b16https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-026-01793-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1CAC-MM-001: Anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and second CAR-T (CART-ASCT-CART2) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with P53 gene abnormalities.2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative outcomes following a novel, in vivo gene therapy generating anti–B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Preliminary results from inMMyCAR, the first-in-human phase 1 study of KLN-10102025 · 24 citations
  3. 3Long-term progression-free survival benefit with ciltacabtagene autoleucel in standard-risk relapsed / refractory multiple myeloma2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4A dual targeting BCMA and CD19 fastcar-t (GC012F/AZD0120) as first-line therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Phase 2 registrational study of anitocabtagene autoleucel for the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: Updated results from iMMagine–12025 · 9 citations