PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Accountability in Research2 citationsOpen Access

Showcasing research achievements and safeguarding research integrity: How do Chinese universities fare?

View Full Paper
SXSuzanne XuYCYunru ChenWLWeiming Liu

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess how Chinese universities manage research integrity and showcase achievements.
  • Analyzed news reports from universities
  • Reviewed academic integrity webpages
  • Examined annual research integrity reports
  • 28.5% of universities published news reports about WTSs
  • 52.8% maintained academic integrity webpages
  • 16.8% released annual research integrity reports
  • Variations exist based on university prestige, retraction status, and WTS prevalence

Abstract

Among these universities, 28.5% published news reports featuring WTSs, 52.8% maintained academic integrity webpages, and 16.8% released annual research integrity reports. Furthermore, significant variations were found across four contextual factors: university prestige (elite universities vs. non-elite universities), retraction status (universities hosting retraction-afflicted WTSs vs. universities hosting retraction-free WTSs), the number of WTSs, and the prevalence of retraction-afflicted WTSs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c77e4eeef8a2a6b18b9https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2026.2654563
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper