PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 2006BMJ1,878 citationsOpen Access

Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process

GEGlyn Elwyn

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Criteria were given the highest ratings where evidence existed, and these were retained. Gaps in research were highlighted. Developers, users, and purchasers of patient decision aids now have a checklist for appraising quality. An instrument for measuring quality of decision aids is being developed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Glyn Elwyn (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df33613b0ba53fb37a1fa4https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.ae
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Interpretive Review : Feasibility and Effects of Decision Aids2000 · 178 citations
  2. 2Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de los ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROM2000 · 213 citations
  3. 3The development of a routine NHS data-based index of performance in general practice (NHSPPI)2002 · 18 citations
  4. 4Choices, Values, and Frames2013 · 5,411 citations
  5. 5Effectiveness and efficiency of methods of dialysis therapy for end-stage renal disease: systematic reviews.1998 · 254 citations