PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2005Agronomy Journal228 citationsOpen Access

Efficient Water Use in Dryland Cropping Systems in the Great Plains

View Full Paper
DNDavid C. NielsenPUPaul W. UngerPMPerry R. Miller

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Successful dryland crop production in the semiarid Great Plains of North America must make efficient use of precipitation that is often limited and erratic in spatial and temporal distribution. The purpose of this paper is to review research on water use efficiency and precipitation use efficiency (PUE) as affected by cropping system and management in the Great Plains. Water use efficiency and PUE increase with residue management practices that increase precipitation storage efficiency, soil surface alterations that reduce runoff, cropping sequences that minimize fallow periods, and use of appropriate management practices for the selected crop. Precipitation use efficiency on a mass‐produced basis is highest for systems producing forage (14. 5 kg ha −1 mm −1) and lowest for rotations with a high frequency of oilseed crops (4. 2 kg ha −1 mm −1) or continuous small‐grain production in the southern plains (2. 8 kg ha −1 mm −1). Precipitation use efficiency when calculated on a price‐received basis ranges from 1. 20 ha −1 mm −1 (for an opportunity‐cropped system with 4 of 5 yr in forage production in the southern plains) to 0. 30 ha −1 mm −1 for a wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ) –grain sorghum Sorghum bicolor (L. ) Moench–fallow system in the southern plains. Throughout the Great Plains region, PUE decreases with more southern latitudes for rotations of similar makeup of cereals, pulses, oilseeds, and forages. Forage systems in the southern Great Plains appear to be highly efficient when PUE is computed on a price‐received basis. In general across the Great Plains, increasing intensity of cropping increases PUE on both a mass‐produced basis and on a price‐received basis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nielsen et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e008982833447a7e255e96https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0364
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cropping System Influence on Planting Water Content and Yield of Winter Wheat2002 · 121 citations
  2. 2Effect of Furrow Diking, Subsoiling, and Slope Position on Crop Yields11984 · 31 citations
  3. 3Soil Organic Matter Changes in Intensively Cropped Dryland Systems1999 · 180 citations
  4. 4Fallow method influences on soil water and precipitation storage efficiency1987 · 87 citations
  5. 5Tillage and Furrow Diking Effects on Water Balance and Yields of Sorghum and Cotton1993 · 30 citations