PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment1 citations

The criterion validity of general and antisocial personality disorder-specific criterion A in the alternative model of personality disorders: A scoping review and meta-analysis.

View Full Paper
NANathan AkokaADAshley L. DunneMTMichael D. Trood

Key Points

  • To assess the criterion validity of measures for evaluating Criterion A in antisocial personality disorder and related constructs.
  • Conducted a scoping review and meta-analysis.
  • Reviewed six databases for studies on Criterion A, ASPD, aggression, and psychopathy.
  • Analyzed 32 identified studies including self-report and observer-rated LPFS measures.
  • Found strong associations between self-report and clinician-rated LPFS measures and Section II ASPD.
  • Moderate effects with psychopathy for self-report LPFS but weak for clinician-rated LPFS.
  • Identified weak to moderate effects for LPFS with aggression and antisocial behavior.

Abstract

The alternative model for personality disorders include two-dimensional criteria: self and interpersonal dysfunction (Criterion A) and maladaptive personality traits (Criterion B). Criterion A is appraised using the Levels of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). Personality disorder-specific impairments are also described. This scoping review and meta-analysis evaluates the criterion validity of self-report and observer-rated LPFS measures, and two antisocial personality disorder (ASPD)-specific measures, in assessing Criterion A for ASPD, psychopathy, antisocial behavior, and aggression. Six databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCare, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed) were searched for studies assessing Criterion A and ASPD, aggression, antisocial behavior, and/or psychopathy. Thirty-two studies were identified. Meta-analysis revealed strong pooled associations between self-report and clinician-rated LPFS measures and Section II ASPD. Effects with psychopathy for self-report LPFS measures were moderate and weak for clinician-rated LPFS. Weak to moderate pooled effects for LPFS with aggression and antisocial behavior were found. ASPD-specific impairments showed moderate associations with Section II ASPD and large associations for psychopathy. Overall, general and ASPD-specific measures demonstrated variable criterion validity with Section II ASPD and associated antisocial constructs. Caution is warranted when assessing Criterion A impairment for antisociality using a single measure in isolation. A clinician-led, multimethod approach that integrates general LPFS-based assessment with instruments specifically designed to capture antisocial features is likely to (a) enhance diagnostic accuracy and (b) improve the clinical utility of Criterion A assessment in informing violence risk formulation and management. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Akoka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07c1e2f7e8953b7cbd913https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000773
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper