PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Journal of Engineering and Applied Science0 citationsOpen Access

Enhancing performance of lightweight electric vehicles through advanced speed control of BLDC motors

ATAli TahaOMOmar MohamedNNNathalie Nazih

Key Points

  • The study aims to optimize the speed control of BLDC motors for lightweight electric vehicles to enhance performance efficiency.
  • Compared four speed control strategies: PI, Hysteresis-PI, Fuzzy Logic, and Hybrid Fuzzy-PI.
  • Utilized MATLAB/Simulink for simulation under consistent load and speed conditions.
  • Evaluated performance based on settling time, steady-state error, overshoot, and rise time.
  • Traditional PI controllers were simple but ineffective under dynamic changes.
  • Hysteresis-PI controller outperformed others, providing the fastest response and improved stability.
  • Overall, Hysteresis-PI is recommended for future EV propulsion systems.

Abstract

Lightweight Electric Vehicles (EVs) require a system that is efficient, reliable, and low maintenance. Among the available options, the Brushless DC (BLDC) motor is desirable due to its compact design, high torque-to-weight ratio, and the absence of mechanical commutation. However, BLDC motors have control challenges because of nonlinear behaviors like back-EMF distortion and load sensitivity. Traditional Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers often have difficulty keeping performance under these dynamic conditions. In this study four closed-loop speed control strategies have been compared for BLDC motors: PI, Hysteresis-PI, Fuzzy Logic, and Hybrid Fuzzy-PI controllers. The aim is to optimize performance for energy-efficient lightweight EVs. Each controller is modified and simulated in MATLAB/Simulink under the same load and speed conditions applied on all four controllers. The performance of the controllers evaluated through settling time, steady-state error, overshoot, and rise time. Simulation results indicate that traditional PI controllers are simple to implement, but they do not adapt well to dynamic changes. The Hysteresis-PI controller showed the best overall performance. It provided the fastest response and improved system stability, making it a strong candidate for future EV propulsion systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Taha et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07c632f7e8953b7cbdb66https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-026-00999-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper