PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Computers0 citationsOpen Access

Quantum-Safe Blockchain: Mapping Research Fronts in Post-Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Threat Models, and QKD Integration

View Full Paper
FDFélix DíazUniversidad Alas PeruanasNCNhell CernaUniversidad Tecnológica del PerúRLRafael LizaUniversidad Continental

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and quantum-safe security measures.
  • Conducted a review of literature using Scopus and Web of Science data sources.
  • Applied a two-block query and a PRISMA-guided workflow for bibliometric mapping.
  • Analyzed 648 journal articles for trends and thematic structures.
  • Publication growth accelerated after 2023, with concentration in a few leading countries.
  • Dominance of IoT-centric deployments and co-occurrence of authentication with blockchain security.
  • Identified inconsistencies in reporting threat models and post-quantum parameters, limiting progress.

Abstract

Quantum computing challenges the long-term security assumptions of blockchain systems that rely on classical public-key cryptography, motivating the adoption of post-quantum cryptography and quantum key distribution (QKD). This review maps research fronts at the intersection of blockchain and quantum-safe security, linking threat assumptions to post-quantum mechanisms, blockchain layers, and QKD positioning. Records were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science using a two-block query and filtered through a PRISMA-guided workflow for bibliometric mapping. The final corpus comprises 648 journal articles and shows accelerated publication growth after 2023, with scientific production concentrated in a small set of leading countries. Keyword structures indicate that IoT-centric deployments dominate the semantic backbone, where authentication and intelligent methods co-occur with blockchain security primitives, while post-quantum and privacy-preserving constructs form a cohesive technical stream. QKD appears as a distinct but more specialized theme, typically discussed at the system level and shaped by infrastructure and scalability constraints. Overall, the literature is moving from conceptual risk articulation toward engineering integration; however, progress is limited by inconsistent reporting of threat models, post-quantum parameter sets, and ledger-level cost trade-offs, highlighting the need for auditable and reproducible evaluation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Díaz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07cc02f7e8953b7cbdf06https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15040240
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper