PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Medical Decision Making2 citationsOpen Access

Social Media Health Information Formats and Endometriosis Treatment-Seeking Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
AGAlice GrahamThe University of SydneyBNBrooke NickelThe University of SydneyKMKirsten McCafferyThe University of Sydney

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how different formats of endometriosis-related social media posts influence women's intentions to seek laparoscopy for diagnosis and treatment.
  • Conducted a 2 × 2 × (2) online randomized controlled trial in Australia.
  • Involved women aged 18 to 45 with no prior endometriosis diagnosis.
  • Participants viewed mock Instagram posts varying in content type (anecdote vs. nonnarrative) and source credibility (WHO vs. layperson).
  • Assessed changes in treatment-seeking intentions after viewing posts and receiving updates on treatment guidelines.
  • Anecdotal posts increased treatment-seeking intentions (mean difference MD = 0.22).
  • WHO posts were viewed as more credible, with a mean difference MD = 0.29.
  • New evidence regarding laparoscopy limitations decreased intentions to pursue the procedure (MD = 0.29).
  • Few differences were observed in intentions between high- and low-credibility sources.

Abstract

BackgroundDespite many women learning about endometriosis on social media, posts about the condition often fail to reflect current evidence. With the content and credibility of online health messages being found to influence behavioral intentions in other areas, this study aimed to explore how the format of endometriosis-related social media posts affects women's intentions to get a laparoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis.DesignIn this 2 × 2 × (2) online randomized controlled trial, Australian women aged 18 to 45 y who had no prior endometriosis diagnosis were randomly assigned to view 1 of 4 mock Instagram posts. Post content (personal anecdote v. nonnarrative, factual information) and source (high-credibility "World Health Organization" (WHO) account v. low credibility layperson account) varied across conditions. A within-subjects component investigated change in intention when participants were informed of new treatment guidelines.ResultsA total of 1,473 women were included in the analysis. Instagram posts featuring an anecdote produced higher treatment-seeking intentions (mean difference MD = 0.22, 95% confidence interval CI = 0.04-0.39) and more favorable attitudes toward getting a laparoscopy compared with posts containing nonnarrative information (MD = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.01-0.25). While the WHO account was perceived as more credible (MD = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.17-0.41), there were no differences in intentions, perceived norms, or self-efficacy toward laparoscopy compared with the layperson account. Advising participants of new evidence regarding the limitations of laparoscopy reduced intentions to get the procedure (MD = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.21-0.37), irrespective of condition.ConclusionsFindings demonstrate the power of anecdotes in shaping treatment preferences. Supplementing evidence-based information with personal anecdotes may ensure accurate yet engaging health information is used by online endometriosis communities to seek appropriate care. Trial registration. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.anzctr.org.au/; ACTRN12624000767505p)HighlightsFraming health information on Instagram as a personal anecdote increased women's intentions to get a laparoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis.We found few differences between high- and low-credibility sources.Informing participants of new evidence and clinical guidelines reduced intentions across all conditions, potentially reflecting more informed decision making.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Graham et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07d1d2f7e8953b7cbe2bchttps://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x261436847
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper