PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Direct Empirical Test of the Curvature Texture Index in Quantum Fractal Geometry: Evidence from Supermassive Black Hole Scaling Relations

View Full Paper
CPChristopher Portelli

Key Points

  • To empirically test the Curvature Texture Index (CTI) in Quantum Fractal Geometry and its implications for supermassive black hole scaling relations.
  • Implemented the Curvature Texture Index using the QFG projection operator.
  • Convolved density profiles with a Gaussian kernel across multiple resolution scales.
  • Analyzed scaling relations from data of 70 galaxies with known black hole masses.
  • The CTI showed a statistically significant negative coefficient in the M_BH scaling relation (δ = −0.357 ± 0.131).
  • Higher curvature texture was associated with smaller black holes at fixed velocity and mass.
  • A morphology-independence test revealed the CTI retains significant information beyond existing parameters.

Abstract

This paper presents the first empirical test of the Curvature Texture Index (CTI) in Quantum Fractal Geometry using an implementation faithful to its formal definition. A prior preprint (DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 19523163, withdrawn) employed a proxy statistic (CTIᵥ1) that is shown here to be a first-order morphological statistic rather than an implementation of the geometric concept. The proper CTI is implemented using the QFG projection operator directly: density profiles are convolved with a Gaussian kernel at 35 logarithmically spaced resolution scales, the spherical Laplacian is computed at each scale, and CTI is obtained by integrating the absolute rate of change of the spatially-averaged squared Laplacian across scales. Applied to N = 70 galaxies with published black hole masses from McConnell & Ma (2013) and Kormendy & Ho (2013), with density profiles reconstructed via the deprojected Sérsic approximation, the proper CTI yields a statistically significant negative coefficient in the MBH scaling relation (δ = −0. 357 ± 0. 131, t = −2. 72, p = 0. 0083, 95% bootstrap CI −0. 621, −0. 093, ΔAIC = −5. 4). Galaxies with higher resolution-dependent curvature texture host smaller black holes at fixed velocity dispersion and stellar mass, consistent with the QFG prediction. Cross-validated R² does not improve at N = 70 and independent replication on a larger sample is required. This constitutes the first direct empirical test of the geometric hypothesis as formally defined in QFG. Addendum (April 2026). A morphology-independence test has been conducted to establish whether CTI carries information beyond Sérsic structural parameters. After orthogonalising CTI against stellar velocity dispersion, stellar mass, and Sérsic index n simultaneously (Model E: σ + M★ + n + CTI), the CTI coefficient strengthens rather than weakens (δ = −0. 702, p < 0. 0001, 95% CI −1. 110, −0. 370). The morphology-independent component CTI⊥ — from which all shared variance with σ, M★, and n has been removed — remains highly significant (δ = −0. 158, p < 0. 0001, residual correlation r = −0. 465). The morphology-independent component of CTI (CTI⊥) captures a statistically significant, irreducible contribution to SMBH scaling relations. Supporting figure: CTIᵢndependenceₜest. pdf. CTI empirical paper (19562898) Note (April 2026). Follow-up independence testing using multi-component profiles and TNG100-1 matched simulations shows that the CTI signal is absorbed by morphological structure when profiles are sufficiently well-characterised. QFG has not been falsified by these results. However, the specific CTI implementation tested does not currently demonstrate independent physical signal beyond morphology. The framework therefore remains theoretically viable but empirically unconfirmed, and requires improved observables or first-principles derivations before it can be considered predictive.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Christopher Portelli (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07d3c2f7e8953b7cbe493https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19562898
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper