PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Nucleic Acids Research0 citationsOpen Access

SP1 antagonizes H3K27me3 to shape chromatin landscapes for RNA polymerase II recruitment during gastrulation

View Full Paper
XSXipeng ShenYWYi WenXTXi Tang

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the mechanisms of RNA polymerase II recruitment at developmental gene promoters during gastrulation.
  • Conducted genome-wide analysis of Pol II occupancy in mouse post-implantation embryos.
  • Examined the interaction between transcription factors and histone modifications.
  • Performed genetic perturbation to assess the role of KMT2B and EED in Pol II loading.
  • Identified that half of bivalent promoters are bound by Pol II in a lineage-specific manner.
  • SP1 binding corresponds with reduced H3K27me3 and increased Pol II occupancy.
  • Loss of SP1 leads to chromatin re-silencing and failure in gene transcription.

Abstract

Following implantation, the epiblast undergoes gastrulation to form the three germ layers, a process requiring precise temporal control of developmental gene expression. However, the mechanisms governing RNA polymerase II (Pol II) engagement at developmental gene promoters during this critical stage remain poorly understood. Here, we present a genome-wide analysis of Pol II occupancy in mouse post-implantation embryos, revealing that nearly half of bivalent promoters are bound by Pol II in a lineage-specific and temporally ordered manner. This recruitment follows a stepwise chromatin remodeling cascade, with initial deposition of H3K27me3, followed by H3K4me3 acquisition and Pol II engagement. Through genetic perturbation, we show that KMT2B promotes Pol II loading via H3K4me3 deposition, whereas the Polycomb component EED restricts this process by maintaining H3K27me3. Notably, we identify the transcription factor SP1 as a critical facilitator of Pol II recruitment at bivalent loci. SP1 binding coincides with reduced H3K27me3 levels and enhanced Pol II occupancy, and its loss leads to chromatin re-silencing and transcriptional failure. Together, our findings establish a chromatin-based regulatory framework in which SP1 and histone modifications cooperatively license the transcriptional activation of developmental genes during germ layer formation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07d8f2f7e8953b7cbe8b3https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkag305
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo2009 · 855 citations
  2. 2Phosphorylation and functions of the RNA polymerase II CTD2006 · 758 citations
  3. 3Regulating RNA polymerase pausing and transcription elongation in embryonic stem cells2011 · 311 citations
  4. 4A double take on bivalent promoters2013 · 862 citations
  5. 5Polycomb Associates Genome-wide with a Specific RNA Polymerase II Variant, and Regulates Metabolic Genes in ESCs2012 · 288 citations