PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Computers & Education2 citationsOpen Access

Can asynchronous learning modules about generative AI increase students’ knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy for genAI?

View Full Paper
APAllison E. Connell PenskyLELydia E. EcksteinMMMichael MelvilleCarnegie Mellon University

Key Points

  • The aim was to test if online learning modules could enhance students' competency in generative AI.
  • Conducted large-scale experiment with 1,368 undergraduate and graduate students.
  • Randomly assigned sections to treatment (learning modules) or control (no modules).
  • Measured generative AI competency at pre and post using knowledge, skills, and attitudinal assessments.
  • Treatment group showed significant improvements in generative AI knowledge and skills.
  • Self-efficacy in working with generative AI increased among students exposed to the modules.
  • Learning outcomes were equitable across various student demographic groups.

Abstract

The goal of the present large-scale experiment was to test if a 90-minute, open access set of online learning modules with embedded practice and feedback would enhance students’ generative artificial intelligence (genAI) competency. We also examined whether impacts were experienced equitably by all included student demographic groups. Participants were 1,368 undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in 65 course sections. Sections were randomly assigned to treatment (engagement with the learning modules between pre- and post-tests) or control (no learning modules between assessments). Generative AI competency was defined as knowledge, skills, and attitudes and was measured at pre and post. The learning modules significantly improved treatment students’ genAI knowledge, prompt engineering skills, fact- and source-checking skills, and self-efficacy. There was a null effect of the modules on the skill of critically evaluating potential bias in genAI’s output. Improvements in genAI competency were equitable across all student groups (birth at sex, race/ethnicity, student level, first-generation status, and academic discipline). Such readily-available competency trainings are important for supporting the emerging necessity of knowing when and how to work with genAI in one’s education and future career. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed. • Created online learning modules to improve students’ genAI competency. • Ran a large experimental study testing the learning modules’ effectiveness. • Measured knowledge, attitudes, and ability to prompt-engineer and interpret output. • Our online learning intervention enhanced students’ genAI competency. • The treatment group experienced equitable learning outcomes across student groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pensky et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07dad2f7e8953b7cbea2ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105640
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper