PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Structural Concrete0 citations

A semi‐empirical tri‐linear model for progressive collapse resistance of self‐centering frictional frames

View Full Paper
YZYanlu ZhangXLXiao LuHXHang Xu

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a model for predicting the progressive collapse resistance of self-centering frictional frames (SCFFs) under specific failure scenarios.
  • Developed a mechanics-based semi-empirical tri-linear model.
  • Identified a hybrid mechanism involving flexural and catenary actions.
  • Derived analytical expressions for yield and capacity using static equilibrium.
  • Validated the model against high-fidelity simulation data.
  • Achieved an average prediction error under 6% compared to simulations.
  • Recommended a resistance reduction factor of 0.88 for safety in design.
  • Provided a simplified analytical tool for engineering practice.

Abstract

Abstract Self‐centering frictional frames (SCFFs) offer seismic resilience; however, their robustness against progressive collapse, a critical requirement for multi‐hazard design, remains poorly understood. Current assessment methods rely heavily on time‐consuming finite element simulations, lacking simplified analytical tools suitable for routine engineering practice. To bridge this gap, this study proposes a mechanics‐based semi‐empirical tri‐linear model to predict the progressive collapse resistance of SCFFs under a middle‐column loss scenario. The study identifies a unique hybrid mechanism combining flexural action (FA) governed by friction devices and catenary action (CA) from continuous reinforcement. Analytical expressions for yield, peak‐FA, and ultimate‐CA capacities are derived using static equilibrium and a numerical database, while displacement limits are formulated via sensitivity analysis. Validation against high‐fidelity simulations demonstrates an average prediction error below 6%. A resistance reduction factor of 0.88 is recommended for design safety. This research offers a concise, robust tool for quantifying SCFF collapse resistance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e3b2f7e8953b7cbf35ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70603
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fiber beam–column element model considering reinforcement anchorage slip in the footing2016 · 50 citations
  2. 2Seismic resistant rocking coupled walls with innovative Resilient Slip Friction (RSF) joints2016 · 140 citations
  3. 3SMA-based self-centering eccentrically braced frame with vertical link member2022 · 18 citations
  4. 4Seismic performance of partial self-centering prestressed concrete frames with friction dampers2024 · 12 citations
  5. 5Finite element modeling and capacity analysis of post-tensioned steel frames against progressive collapse2016 · 36 citations