PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

From Statute to Lived Reality: Institutional Gaps in Addressing Domestic Violence Against Women in India

View Full Paper
MIMargreat IsaacDPDr. Babita Pandey

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the discrepancies between domestic violence laws and their implementation in India.
  • Examined the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
  • Analyzed the roles of police, courts, and welfare institutions.
  • Utilized an institutional and sociological framework.
  • Identified persistent gaps between legal frameworks and institutional practices.
  • Found that moral assumptions influence domestic violence governance.
  • Concluded that existing systems operate as fragmented interventions rather than cohesive protections.

Abstract

India’s response to domestic violence has undergone a significant transformation with the enactment of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which expanded the understanding of abuse beyond physical harm and introduced civil remedies aimed at protection and rehabilitation. Despite this progressive statutory framework, the everyday experiences of women seeking protection reveal persistent gaps between legal intent and institutional practice. This paper examines domestic violence governance in India through an institutional and sociological lens, arguing that the failure of protection mechanisms is rooted less in legal inadequacy and more in fragmented governance, weak institutional accountability, and deeply embedded social norms. By analysing the roles of police, courts, protection officers, and allied welfare institutions, the study demonstrates how domestic violence law is routinely mediated by moral assumptions about marriage, reconciliation, and female responsibility. The paper contends that domestic violence governance in India operates as a layered system of partial interventions rather than a coherent protective regime. It concludes by proposing a shift toward integrated, accountability-driven, and survivor-centred institutional frameworks that align legal mandates with lived realities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Isaac et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e582f7e8953b7cbf677https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18697011
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper