PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026BMC Medical Education1 citationsOpen Access

The effect of artificial intelligence–based scenarios on the clinical education of rehabilitation students: an anatomy-based randomized controlled study

RYRıdvan YıldızONOnur Seçgin Nişancı

Key Points

  • This study examines how AI-generated patient scenarios affect digital competence, clinical self-efficacy, and attitudes toward AI in rehabilitation education.
  • Conducted an 8-week training program with 90 volunteer students divided into three groups
  • Applied AI-supported, internet-supported + traditional, and traditional-only training models
  • Utilized various scales for assessment before and after the intervention
  • Employed one-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis tests for group comparisons, and paired t-tests for within-group changes
  • Significant increases in clinical self-efficacy and AI attitude scores in all groups (p < .05)
  • Digital competence improved in AI-supported and internet-supported + traditional groups (p < .05)
  • Intergroup comparisons showed significant differences in digital competence and AI attitude scores (p < .05)
  • Clinical self-efficacy did not show significant differences at the intergroup level (p > .05)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of using patient scenarios generated by artificial intelligence in rehabilitation education through different training models (artificial intelligence-based, internet-supported + traditional, and traditional only) on students’ digital competence, clinical self-efficacy, and attitudes towards artificial intelligence. Ninety volunteer students were included in the study and divided into three groups using block randomisation: (1) artificial intelligence-supported (2), internet-supported + traditional method, and (3) traditional method only. An 8-week training programme was conducted for each scenario, consisting of weekly 90-minute sessions that alternated between assessment and treatment applications. The Digital Competence Self-Assessment Scale, Clinical Self-Efficacy Scale, and Artificial Intelligence Attitude Scale were administered before and after the intervention. One-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for between-group comparisons, and paired t-tests were used for within-group changes (α = 0.05). In the intra-group analyses, a significant increase was observed in clinical self-efficacy and artificial intelligence attitude scores in all groups (p .05). Artificial intelligence-based scenario training increases the level of digital competence in rehabilitation students and develops positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence. The findings indicate that this method can be integrated into educational programmes to strengthen clinical training processes. Further studies with larger samples, longer-term interventions, and objective performance measures are recommended to understand the effects on clinical skills.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yıldız et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e582f7e8953b7cbf689https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09220-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper