PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026BMC Medical Education1 citationsOpen Access

CBL combined with MDT mode in clinical teaching of liver cancer: a randomized controlled study

SZSimin ZhangJLJiao LiCDCui Deng

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the effectiveness of combining case-based learning with multidisciplinary team teaching in liver cancer education.
  • Randomized controlled trial with 112 postgraduate students from Dali University
  • Experimental group received CBL combined with MDT; control group received traditional lectures
  • Effectiveness evaluated through theoretical exams, clinical assessments, and surveys
  • Statistical analysis conducted using independent t-tests and chi-square tests
  • Experimental group scored significantly higher in theoretical exams (87.15 vs. 81.23, P<0.01)
  • Clinical skills also improved in the experimental group (86.42 vs. 81.08, P<0.01)
  • Subdomain analysis of OSCE showed superior performance in history taking, test interpretation, treatment planning, and communication
  • Questionnaires indicated higher satisfaction in the experimental group for learning interest, clinical thinking, team collaboration, and communication skills

Abstract

Liver cancer management requires multidisciplinary collaboration, yet traditional clinical teaching often fails to foster integrated clinical reasoning skills among medical students. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining case-based learning (CBL) with multidisciplinary team (MDT) mode in clinical teaching of liver cancer. A total of 112 postgraduate students from Dali University Clinical Medical School who completed clinical internships at The Third People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province between January 2023 and June 2025 were enrolled and randomly assigned to experimental group (n = 56) and control group (n = 56). The control group received traditional lecture-based teaching, while the experimental group received CBL combined with MDT teaching. Teaching effectiveness was evaluated through theoretical examinations, clinical skills assessments using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and questionnaire surveys. Independent t-tests and chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher theoretical examination scores (87.15±5.34 vs. 81.23±6.12, t=3.41, P<0.01, Cohen's d=1.03) and clinical skills assessment scores (86.42±5.68 vs. 81.08±5.95, t=2.89, P<0.01, Cohen's d=0.91) compared to the control group. OSCE subdomain analysis revealed superior performance in history taking (17.82±1.56 vs. 16.94±1.78, P=0.017), diagnostic test interpretation (17.65±1.72 vs. 16.51±1.93, P=0.012), treatment planning (17.93±1.48 vs. 16.32±1.85, P=0.002), and doctor-patient communication (17.58±1.63 vs. 16.21±1.89, P=0.008). Questionnaire surveys indicated significantly higher satisfaction rates in the experimental group regarding learning interest stimulation (94.6% vs. 78.6%, P=0.011), clinical thinking cultivation (96.4% vs. 76.8%, P=0.002), team collaboration enhancement (92.9% vs. 71.4%, P=0.003), and communication skills improvement (94.6% vs. 69.6%, P<0.001). CBL combined with MDT mode significantly improves theoretical knowledge acquisition, clinical skills performance, and comprehensive competencies in liver cancer clinical teaching. This integrated approach represents an effective pedagogical strategy worthy of broader implementation in oncology education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1ce065cdc762e9d857280https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09212-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper