PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Geophysical Survey at Land at Polehanger Lane, Hemel Hempstead

View Full Paper
TCThomas Cockcroft

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the geological and archaeological features at the Polehanger Lane site using magnetic sensors.
  • Conducted a geophysical survey using a cart with paired Bartington magnetic sensors.
  • Aligned sensors to minimize earth's magnetic field effects and collected data at 0.125m intervals.
  • Utilized a Trimble RTK GPS system for accurate geographic referencing of readings.
  • Analyzed the data for local magnetic anomalies compared to the general magnetic background.
  • Detected 20th Century building foundations in Areas 1 and 3 corresponding to historic maps.
  • Identified uncertain magnetic responses likely from natural processes and modern features.
  • Recorded former field boundaries and locations of two service pipes in the surveyed area.
  • Noted that areas of increased magnetic response correlate with underlying geological variations.

Abstract

Data was collected using a cart carrying four paired Bartington magnetic sensors. Four sensors mounted 1m horizontally apart and very accurately aligned to nullify the effects of the earth's magnetic field. Readings relate to the difference in localised magnetic anomalies compared with the general magnetic background. Each data point is geographically referenced using an on-board Trimble RTK survey grade GPS system. Readings were taken at 0.125m centres along traverses 1.0m apart. Readings relate to the difference in localised magnetic anomalies compared with the general magnetic background. The magnetometer survey has not recorded any magnetic responses that could be interpreted as being of archaeological interest. The survey has recorded the locations of 20th Century building foundations in Areas 1 and 3, which correspond with buildings that are visible on historic mapping. Responses of uncertain origin have been identified across the data; they are probably due to natural and modern processes. Uncertain zones of increased response could be infilled chalk extraction pits. Former field boundaries and two service pipes have been recorded in the survey. Discrete anomalies and zones of increased magnetic response are due to variations in the underlying geology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas Cockcroft (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1ceaa5cdc762e9d857aa8https://doi.org/10.5284/1140663
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper