PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Synergistic Governance of Pollution Reduction and Carbon Mitigation Through Air Quality Ecological Compensation: Evidence from China

View Full Paper
ZCZhuo ChenQBQingxuan Bu

Key Points

  • This research investigates whether incentives for air quality improvement can also reduce carbon emissions in China.
  • Analyzed panel data from 268 prefecture-level cities from 2007 to 2023
  • Employed a multi-period difference-in-differences design
  • Conducted heterogeneity analysis based on city characteristics
  • Applied a two-step mechanism analysis to avoid bias
  • Significant reduction in the composite pollution carbon index (β = -0.213, p < 0.01)
  • Industrial structure upgrades and energy consumption intensity improvement observed
  • Effects are stronger in cities with higher fiscal capacity and urbanization
  • Diminishing returns noted in cities with high green coverage

Abstract

Atmospheric pollutants and CO2 share common origins in fossil fuel combustion, raising the question of whether fiscal incentives targeting air quality alone can indirectly reduce carbon emissions. This study examines this question by evaluating China’s air quality ecological compensation policy, a provincial-level horizontal fiscal transfer mechanism under which cities are rewarded or penalized according to changes in ambient air quality indicators, without incorporating any explicit carbon-related assessment criteria. Using panel data from 268 prefecture-level cities over 2007–2023 and a multi-period difference-in-differences design, we find that the policy significantly reduces the composite pollution carbon index (β = −0.213, p < 0.01), with the effect confirmed by an alternative weighted-average specification (β = −0.153, p < 0.01) and robust to propensity score matching, one-period lagged regression, exclusion of provincial-level municipalities, and exclusion of the COVID-19 period. A two-step mechanism analysis, adopted to avoid post-treatment bias from “bad controls,” reveals that the policy promotes industrial structure upgrading (β = 0.253, p < 0.01), enhances green technological innovation capacity (β = 0.047, p < 0.10), and reduces energy consumption intensity (β = −0.012, p < 0.01). Heterogeneity analysis based on quartile subsamples shows that the synergistic benefits concentrate in cities with stronger fiscal capacity (β = −0.349, p < 0.01 versus insignificant for low-support cities), higher economic development, and greater urbanization (β = −1.558, p < 0.01 for highly urbanized cities), while the policy effect is statistically insignificant in the least-advantaged subgroups across these three dimensions. In contrast, the green coverage dimension reveals an opposite pattern: the effect is strongest in cities with lower green coverage (β = −0.378, p < 0.05) and insignificant in high-coverage cities, indicating diminishing marginal returns where environmental baselines are already favorable. These findings highlight the need for differentiated compensation standards, including tiered compensation coefficients and targeted fiscal support for resource-constrained regions, to ensure equitable governance outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cf625cdc762e9d858552https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083909
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper