PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism2 citations

Comparative Predictive Value of Three Visceral Adiposity Indices for Cardiovascular Disease: A 17.5‐Year Korean Cohort Study

View Full Paper
ACA-Ra ChoYonsei UniversitySHSeok‐Jae HeoYonsei UniversityTHTaehwa Han

Key Points

  • This research assesses the relationship between three visceral adiposity indices and cardiovascular disease risk.
  • Recruited 8192 middle-aged Korean adults without cardiovascular disease at baseline.

Structured PICO

Do visceral adiposity indices (METS-VF, VAI, LAP) predict incident cardiovascular disease in middle-aged adults without baseline CVD?

P
Population
8,192 middle-aged Korean adults without cardiovascular disease at baseline from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study
I
Intervention
Metabolic score for visceral fat (METS-VF), visceral adiposity index (VAI), and lipid accumulation product (LAP)
C
Comparator
Lowest tertile of each respective adiposity index
O
Outcome
Incident cardiovascular disease (self-reported physician diagnoses confirmed by trained interviewers)hard clinical

METS-VF, VAI, and LAP are independently associated with increased CVD risk, with METS-VF demonstrating the best discriminatory performance for risk stratification.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death worldwide, with excess visceral adipose tissue (VAT) being identified as an independent indicator of poor cardiovascular outcomes. We examined the association between three indices of VAT, namely, metabolic score for visceral fat (METS‐VF), visceral adiposity index (VAI), and lipid accumulation product (LAP), and the development of CVD in a large cohort of middle‐aged Korean adults. Materials and Methods The study recruited 8192 participants without CVD at baseline from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. METS‐VF, VAI, and LAP were calculated using established formulas based on anthropometric and metabolic parameters. Incident CVD was defined based on self‐reported physician diagnoses confirmed by trained interviewers. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for incident CVD. Heagerty's integrated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (iAUC) were used to compare the discriminatory performance of three indices. Results The adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for incident CVD in the highest tertile compared with the lowest tertile were 1.62 (1.29–2.03), 1.38 (1.08–1.77), and 1.66 (1.32–2.09) for METS‐VF, VAI, and LAP, respectively. METS‐VF showed statistically higher discriminatory performance than VAI and LAP for incident CVD ( p < 0.001), although the overall discriminative ability of indices was modest. Conclusions METS‐VF, VAI, and LAP were independently associated with an increased risk of CVD events. Among these indices, METS‐VF demonstrated relatively better discriminatory performance, suggesting its potential role as a complementary tool for cardiovascular risk stratification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cho et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cfe05cdc762e9d858dddhttps://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70765
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper