PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 26, 2007SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología486 citationsOpen Access

Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews

MCMike Clarke

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Fifteen years ago, what was to become OMERACT met for the first time in The Netherlands to discuss ways in which the multitude of outcomes in assessments of the effects of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis might be standardised. In Trials, Tugwell et al have described the need for, and success of, this initiative 1 and Cooney and colleagues have set out their plans for a corresponding initiative for ulcerative colitis 2. Why do we need such initiatives? What's the problem? And are these and other initiatives the solution?

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mike Clarke (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e2549a34ca36c38e86b848https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-39
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper