PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Environmental and Occupational Health Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Usefulness of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire to identify employees at risk of depression in the Japanese Stress Check Program: a large-scale cross-sectional study

ATAkizumi TsutsumiKMKeiichi MatsuzakiRIReiko Inoue

Key Points

  • To assess the effectiveness of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire in identifying employees at risk of depression.
  • Conducted an online cross-sectional study with 25,000 employees
  • Participants completed the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
  • Performed receiver operating characteristic curve analyses to evaluate screening performance.
  • 25.9% of employees showed potential depression (PHQ-9 score ≥10)
  • 18.8% identified as 'high-risk' using the BJSQ
  • Sensitivity of BJSQ was 50.9% and specificity was 92.4%
  • Area under the curve was 0.716; positive predictive value was 70.0% and negative predictive value was 84.8%

Abstract

Objectives: The Japanese National Stress Check Program recommends the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (BJSQ) for annual psychosocial assessments in the workplace. We examined the performance of this instrument in screening depression. Methods: We conducted an online cross-sectional study involving 25,000 employees in October 2024. Participants completed the BJSQ and the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). We conducted receiver operating characteristic curve analyses to estimate the screening performance of the BJSQ cutoff points recommended in the Stress Check Program manual. Results: The prevalence of workers with potential depression (PHQ-9 score ≥10) was 25.9%. The prevalence of "high-risk" employees defined using the BJSQ criteria recommended in the Program manual was 18.8%, with sensitivity of 50.9%, specificity of 92.4%, Youden index of 0.433, area under the curve of 0.716, positive predictive value of 70.0%, negative predictive value of 84.8%, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 6.7 and 0.5, respectively. Conclusion: Identifying "high stress" employees as per the Stress Check Program manual recommendation is informative to screen employees with potential depression provided that appropriate follow-up is undertaken. When using this information, practitioners should consider its limitations as a screening tool.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tsutsumi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f7340886becb653ea45https://doi.org/10.1539/eohp.2025-0034
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Factorial structure for the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire in Japanese health care workers2013 · 1 citations
  2. 2Screening for Major Depressive Disorder with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9 and PHQ-2) in an Outpatient Clinic Staffed by Primary Care Physicians in Japan: A Case Control Study2015 · 37 citations
  3. 3Relationship between psychological and physical work-related stress and urinary biopyrrin levels: A cross-sectional study2025
  4. 4Assessing depression among the Japanese population: psychometric properties of the Japanese version of Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-self-reported version2026
  5. 5[Study on the applicability of the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire based on classical test theory and item response theory].2024