PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Engineering Structures0 citationsOpen Access

Axial load–moment interaction diagram of full-scale hollow square columns reinforced with GFRP bars and ties

View Full Paper
AMAmr MahmoudSMSalaheldin MousaHMHamdy M. Mohamed

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how hollow square concrete columns reinforced with GFRP behave under different loading conditions and to assess their capacities.
  • Tested eight full-scale hollow square columns under varying eccentric loading.
  • Columns were reinforced with either steel or GFRP bars and stirrups.
  • Evaluated different eccentricity levels (10%, 20%, 40%, 80%) and hollowness effects.
  • Conducted a comparative analysis of failure modes and load capacities.
  • GFRP-reinforced columns showed similar failure modes and crack patterns to steel-reinforced columns.
  • Peak load decreased with increased eccentricity for both reinforcement types.
  • Low and moderate eccentricities led to compression-controlled failure, while high eccentricity led to tension-controlled failure.
  • Neglecting the contribution of GFRP longitudinal bars underestimated the axial and flexural capacities.

Abstract

The present study investigated the structural behavior of hollow square concrete columns reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars and ties under eccentric loading. Eight columns with a square cross-section of 400 × 400 mm and 2000 mm in height with a 150 mm diameter hollow core were cast and tested. Four columns were reinforced with steel stirrups and bars, and the other four were reinforced with GFRP bars and stirrups. All the columns had the same reinforcement ratio (1.6%). This study considered different test variables such as reinforcement type (steel and GFRP) and load eccentricity levels (10%, 20%, 40%, and 80%). In addition, the effect of hollowness was assessed through comparative analysis. The test findings show that the GFRP-reinforced hollow columns exhibited similar failure modes and crack patterns to their steel-reinforced counterparts across all eccentricities. In addition, increasing eccentricity progressively reduced the peak load for both GFRP- and steel-reinforced hollow square concrete columns. The failure of the specimens tested at low and moderate eccentricity levels (10%, 20%, and 40%) was compression-controlled. In contrast, the specimens loaded at high eccentricity (80%) experienced excessive lateral displacement, extensive cracking, and large GFRP-bar strains, indicating tension-controlled failure. Furthermore, the failure envelope of the GFRP-reinforced specimens was marginally smaller than that of their steel-reinforced counterparts. Overall, eccentricity had a greater effect on column behavior than reinforcement type. Compression bars in the hollow square columns contributed more to axial-load capacity than those in solid columns, with their contribution increasing with eccentricity. Lastly, a parametric study was conducted to evaluate the effects of reinforcement type and ratio, concrete compressive strength, hollowness percentage, and compression reinforcement. The results show that neglecting the compressive contribution of longitudinal GFRP led to an underestimation of the axial and flexural capacities of the hollow square concrete columns. In addition, increasing the hollowness ratio reduced the axial and flexural capacities of the GFRP-reinforced HSCCs under concentric and low eccentric loads, with diminishing effect at higher eccentricities. • Structural behavior of hollow square concrete columns reinforced with GFRP bars and ties. • Failure mechanisms of hollow square columns reinforced with GFRP bars and ties. • Developing the P-M interaction diagram of GFRP reinforced hollow square columns. • Assessing the contribution of GFRP bars on the capacity of hollow square columns.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mahmoud et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f7340886becb653eab7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122778
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper