PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Ecological Indicators0 citationsOpen Access

The decomposition of beta diversity reveals the difference between crustacean and rotifer communities in response to environmental change in tropical reservoirs

View Full Paper
YZYanan ZhangZWZhixin WangJLJiayi Li

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how crustacean and rotifer communities differ in response to environmental changes in tropical freshwater ecosystems.
  • Analyzed β-diversity patterns of crustaceans and rotifers across 21 tropical reservoirs.
  • Applied two decomposition frameworks to assess community variation.
  • Used Mantel tests and Generalized Dissimilarity Modeling to understand influences on community structure.
  • Conducted Structural Equation Modeling to analyze food resource preferences.
  • Crustacean β-diversity exhibited higher nestedness and lower turnover than rotifers.
  • Crustacean communities were influenced by both environmental filtering and weak dispersal limitations.
  • Rotifer communities were primarily shaped by environmental filtering alone.
  • Spatial asynchrony between the two groups was indicated by Local Contribution to Beta Diversity (LCBD).
  • Different food resource preferences were observed: crustaceans favor cryptophytes while rotifers prefer cyanobacteria.

Abstract

Crustaceans and rotifers are key components of freshwater ecosystems, exhibiting distinct life-history strategies and functional traits. However, these two groups are often integrated into a single assemblage in analysis of zooplankton communities, potentially obscuring the mechanisms underlying community variation. As a key measure of community variation, beta diversity (β-diversity) and its decomposition provide critical insights into the processes shaping community structure. We compared β-diversity patterns of crustaceans and rotifers across 21 tropical reservoirs within a large river basin, applying two complementary decomposition frameworks. Crustacean β-diversity showed higher nestedness and lower turnover components than that of rotifers. Both Mantel tests and Generalized Dissimilarity Modeling (GDM) revealed that crustacean community variation was jointly influenced by environmental filtering—primarily total phosphorus concentration and rotifer abundance—and weak dispersal limitation associated with spatial distance. In contrast, rotifer communities were mainly shaped by environmental filtering. Local Contribution to Beta Diversity (LCBD) further indicated spatial asynchrony between crustaceans and rotifers. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) confirmed differences in food resource preferences between the two groups: crustaceans responded strongly to cryptophyte biomass, whereas rotifers were more associated with cyanobacterial biomass. Our findings suggest that contrasting functional traits and feeding strategies lead to distinct β-diversity patterns and environmental responses between crustaceans and rotifers. These results underscore the importance of analyzing these groups separately to improve ecological monitoring, biodiversity assessment, and the understanding of community assembly mechanisms. • The study reveals significant differences in β-diversity composition between crustaceans and rotifers. • Environmental filtering and dispersal limitation jointly drive variation in crustacean communities, whereas rotifer communities are mainly shaped by environmental filtering. • Differences in food resource preferences may lead to the spatial asynchrony of the LCBDs between crustaceans and rotifers. • These findings highlight the crustaceans and rotifers must be analyzed separately to ensure accurate freshwater ecosystem assessments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f7340886becb653eb47https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114864
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper