PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026BMC Neurology0 citationsOpen Access

The association between ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and 90-day ischemic stroke following transient ischemic attack in hypertensive patients: a retrospective cohort study

BWBo WangYZYunpeng ZhangXWXueying Wang

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate ambulatory blood pressure monitoring parameters for predicting the risk of ischemic stroke within 90 days following a transient ischemic attack in hypertensive patients.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 1,276 hypertensive patients with a history of transient ischemic attack.

Structured PICO

Do ambulatory blood pressure monitoring parameters predict the 90-day risk of ischemic stroke in hypertensive patients following a transient ischemic attack?

P
Population
1,276 adult patients (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with primary hypertension and transient ischemic attack (TIA) presenting with focal neurological deficits, without history of prior stroke. Single-center cohort in China.
I
Intervention
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameters derived from 24-hour recordings initiated within 48 hours after TIA episode (specifically evaluating nighttime systolic blood pressure variability, daytime systolic blood pressure load, morning blood pressure surge, nighttime systolic blood pressure, and duration of hypertension).
O
Outcome
Occurrence of ischemic stroke (IS) within 90 days following the index TIA, confirmed by neuroimaging.hard clinical

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring parameters, particularly nighttime systolic blood pressure variability and daytime systolic blood pressure load, provide superior 90-day ischemic stroke risk stratification compared to the ABCD2 score in hypertensive TIA patients.

Abstract

Ischemic stroke (IS) is a major public health challenge. Transient ischemic attack (TIA) serves as a critical warning sign, particularly in hypertensive patients where early risk stratification remains difficult. While ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameters strongly associated with cerebrovascular events, their predictive value for post-TIA stroke in hypertension is unclear. This study evaluated ABPM parameters for predicting 90-day acute IS risk in hypertensive TIA patients. This single-center retrospective cohort included 1,276 hypertensive patients with TIA. All underwent 24-hour ABPM within 48 h. The outcome was IS within 90 days. LASSO regression selected key variables from 20 ABPM indices. Their independent association with IS was assessed using multivariable Cox regression across four progressively adjusted models. Predictive performance was evaluated via receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) curves, nonlinearity via restricted cubic splines (RCS), and robustness via subgroup analyses. LASSO identified five key variables: nighttime systolic blood pressure variability (nSBPCV), daytime systolic blood pressure load (dSBPL), morning blood pressure surge (MBPS), nighttime systolic blood pressure (nSBP) and duration of hypertension. After all the adjustments, these variables remained independent risk factors for the occurrence of IS within 90 days in patients with a history of hypertension who suffered from TIA (all P < 0.001). nSBPCV (AUC = 0.834) and dSBPL (AUC = 0.804) outperformed the ABCD2 score (AUC = 0.685). RCS revealed nonlinear association for hypertension duration, nSBPCV, and dSBPL with clear inflection points (5.9 years, 9.1%, 37.3%). Results were consistent across subgroups. In hypertensive TIA patients, ABPM-derived parameters, especially nSBPCV and dSBPL, are strong predictors of 90-day IS risk, superior to ABCD2. The identified nonlinear relationships and inflection points provide actionable thresholds for personalized risk stratification and precise blood pressure management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f9e40886becb653edbdhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-026-04855-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper