PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026JMIR Biomedical Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of a Noninvasive Device in the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain Using Low-Level Light Therapy: Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentric Study

SMSurya Prakash MaguluriVPVinod Kumar PenubakalaSASai Laxman Anne

Key Points

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CURAPOD device in managing acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain compared to a placebo.
  • Double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentric study design
  • 240 participants aged 18-60 with acute or chronic musculoskeletal pain
  • Treatment duration of 30 minutes using either the CURAPOD or control device
  • Pain intensity measured at baseline and at multiple post-treatment intervals
  • Participants using CURAPOD reported up to 60% pain reduction, significantly higher than the placebo group
  • Significant effects of both time and treatment group on pain relief were observed
  • No significant differences were found based on pain site or skin type
  • No adverse events were reported during the study

Abstract

Abstract Background Musculoskeletal pain significantly impacts quality of life and daily functioning. Light-based therapies, including those using red and infrared wavelengths, have shown potential in pain management due to their anti-inflammatory and tissue healing properties. CURAPOD, a pain management device developed by Litemed, uses a combination of visible red and infrared light for noninvasive pain relief. Objective This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Litemed’s pain management device (CURAPOD) in managing acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain at various pain sites, in comparison with a placebo, and to evaluate its efficacy across different skin types. Methods In a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentric study, 240 participants (aged 18‐60 years) with acute or chronic musculoskeletal pain were enrolled and treated with either the test or control device for 30 minutes. The test device contains 7 LEDs designed to emit a combination of visible red and infrared radiation, while the control device emits visible light of the red spectrum. Pain intensity was subjectively measured at baseline, at 30 minutes after treatment, and at time windows of 8 to 12 hours and 21 to 24 hours after treatment. Results A greater number of participants reported a reduction in pain (of up to 60%) in the treatment group than in the placebo group. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant effects of time ( F 3,684 =282.37; P <.001) and treatment group ( F 1,228 =662.12; P <.001), indicating that the relief experienced may be more sustained in the treatment group. No significant effects of pain site ( F 5,228 =0.169; P =.97) or skin type ( F 5,228 =0.8; P =.55) were observed, suggesting consistent action across anatomical locations and skin types. No significant adverse events were reported. Conclusions The device appears to be safe and viable as a nonpharmacological adjunct for managing acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain. Treatment with the device showed short-term pain reduction, with reports of up to 60% pain reduction within 30 minutes of use and sustained self-reported relief in pain for up to 20 hours after treatment. No significant effects of pain sites or skin type on reduction in visual analog scale scores were observed, suggesting broad applicability. However, these results must be interpreted with caution while considering the limitations inherent to the study methodology and short-term follow-up. These findings should be interpreted as evidence of short-term analgesic response rather than definitive clinical effectiveness. Further investigation through rigorously designed randomized controlled trials and longitudinal studies is necessary to definitively establish the efficacy of the device, the durability of its action, and the potential integration of CURAPOD into pain management strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maguluri et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f9e40886becb653edfdhttps://doi.org/10.2196/87566
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a blue light device for the treatment of chronic back pain2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Clinical efficacy study of LED red and infrared light therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain2026
  3. 3Cross-Over Study Evaluating Photobiomodulation in Pain Control in the Lower Limb2024
  4. 4Shedding light on pain management: a translational systematic review of light therapy for the treatment of chronic pain.2026
  5. 5Feasibility and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Full-Body Red and Near-Infrared Photobiomodulation for Musculoskeletal Pain in a Predominantly Hispanic/Latino Population: A Single-Arm Pilot Study2026