PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026European Urology Open Science0 citationsOpen Access

Quality of Life After Radical Cystectomy: Meta-analysis of Neobladder and Ileal Conduit Outcomes Across Multiple Assessment Tools

View Full Paper
EMErvita MedianaAHAgus R.A.H. HamidFRFakhri Rahman

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare long-term quality of life outcomes between neobladder and ileal conduit after radical cystectomy.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines
  • Included studies comparing neobladder and ileal conduit in adults with follow-up over 12 months
  • Analyzed data from 19 studies involving 2379 patients using statistical software
  • Neobladder was linked to higher global health status and functional well-being scores
  • Ileal conduit showed better urinary outcomes, indicating a different quality of life focus
  • Heterogeneity among studies was moderate to high, influenced by geographic location and tumor characteristics

Abstract

No urinary diversion is universally superior after radical cystectomy; the most appropriate option depends on patient priorities rather than surgical preference alone. The orthotopic neobladder is associated with higher global quality of life and better psychosocial outcomes, largely due to preservation of body image and sexual function. The ileal conduit provides more stable urinary function and simpler daily management, reducing the burden of incontinence and self-care demands. These outcomes represent a clear functional trade-off, not a superiority hierarchy between diversion types. Shared decision-making is essential—selection should incorporate age, comorbidities, lifestyle expectations, and the patient’s willingness and ability to manage long-term self-care requirements. Radical cystectomy (RC) requires urinary diversion, commonly orthotopic neobladder (ONB) or ileal conduit (IC). While ONB preserves natural voiding, IC is technically simpler. This study aimed to compare long-term (>12 mo) quality of life (QoL) outcomes between ONB and IC to aid preoperative shared decision-making. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to September 15, 2025. We included studies comparing ONB and IC in adults with follow-up >12 mo. Heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed bias, and Review Manager v5.4 was used for analysis. Nineteen studies involving 2379 patients were analyzed. For all assessment tools used (EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-BL, SF-36, and Bladder Cancer Index BCI), higher scores indicate better QoL or function. Pooled analysis showed that ONB was associated with higher global health status (EORTC QLQ-C30: mean difference MD = −9.42, p = 0.009; negative value indicates higher score in ONB) and functional well-being (FACT-BL −2.60, p = 0.010). Conversely, the IC group demonstrated higher scores in urinary outcomes (BCI Urinary: MD = 22.81, p = 0.02; positive value indicates higher score in IC). Heterogeneity among studies was moderate to high. Meta-regression indicated geographic location and tumor characteristics influenced heterogeneity. Limitations include observational design and potential selection bias. ONB reconstruction is associated with higher overall QoL scores, while IC is associated with higher urinary scores. These findings represent clinical trade-offs rather than superiority. Surgical selection should be individualized, balancing patient preference for body image against the risk of functional management challenge.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mediana et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31ff140886becb653f002https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2026.03.005
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper