Cities are increasingly expected to achieve environmentally sustainable outcomes while simultaneously adapting to rapid technological transformation and growing governance complexity. However, sustainability performance in urban systems cannot be explained by technological infrastructure alone. Institutional capacity and algorithmic governance capabilities play a critical role in shaping coherent environmental policy implementation and green urban performance, particularly in transition city contexts. This study proposes the ISAG-G Governance Framework (Institutional and Smart Algorithmic Governance for Green Performance), a governance-oriented analytical framework designed to assess green urban governance capacity. The framework integrates four governance dimensions: institutional governance capacity, algorithmic and digital governance enablement, green urban governance performance, and citizen sustainability interaction. Methodologically, the study develops a composite governance index based on a structured indicator system. Indicator weights are determined using the Best–Worst Method (BWM) through expert consultation, while Min–Max normalization and weighted aggregation are applied to construct the composite index. The framework is empirically applied through a comparative analysis of five transition municipalities (evidence from Armenia) representing different levels of administrative capacity and urban development. The findings reveal distinct governance profiles across municipalities and highlight the importance of institutional coherence and algorithmic governance capacity in shaping green urban performance. By moving beyond infrastructure-centric approaches, the proposed framework provides both an analytical and policy-oriented tool for evaluating urban sustainability governance in transition city contexts.
Mkhitaryan et al. (2026) studied this question.