PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Horticulturae0 citationsOpen Access

Environment-Guided Multimodal Pest Detection and Risk Assessment in Fruit and Vegetable Production Systems

View Full Paper
JSJiapeng SunYPY PengZZZhimeng Zhang

Key Points

  • This research focuses on creating an integrated method for detecting pests and assessing their risk in fruit and vegetable production systems, aiming to improve pest management decisions.
  • Developed a multimodal model integrating pest visual data and environmental factors.
  • Constructed an environment-guided representation learning mechanism and joint optimization strategy.
  • Conducted experiments using multi-crop and multi-year field data from Wuyuan County.
  • Achieved pest identification accuracy of 0.947, outperforming major visual detection models.
  • Risk discrimination accuracy reached 0.887, surpassing traditional methods by 4.5 percentage points.
  • Detection performance metrics (mAP@50 and mAP@75) were 0.962 and 0.821, respectively.

Abstract

Aimed at the practical challenge that pest occurrence in fruit and vegetable horticultural production exhibits strong environmental dependency, pronounced stage characteristics, and high sensitivity to control decision-making, a multimodal pest recognition and occurrence risk joint modeling method is proposed to address the limitation that conventional intelligent plant protection systems focus primarily on pest identification while lacking risk discrimination capability. Within a unified network framework, pest visual information and environmental temporal data are integrated through the construction of an environment-guided representation learning mechanism, a recognition–risk joint optimization strategy, and a risk-aware decision representation modeling structure. In this manner, pest category recognition and occurrence risk evaluation are conducted simultaneously, thereby providing direct decision support for precision prevention and control in fruit and vegetable production. Systematic experimental evaluation is conducted based on multi-crop and multi-year field data collected from Wuyuan County, Bayannur City, Inner Mongolia. Overall comparative results demonstrate that an identification accuracy of 0.947, a precision of 0.936, and a recall of 0.924 are achieved on the test set, all of which significantly outperform mainstream visual detection models such as YOLOv8, DETR, and Mask R-CNN. In terms of detection performance, mAP@50 and mAP@75 reach 0.962 and 0.821, respectively, indicating stable localization and discrimination capability under complex backgrounds and dense small-target conditions. For the occurrence risk discrimination task, a risk accuracy of 0.887 is obtained, representing an improvement of approximately 4.5 percentage points compared with the simple multimodal feature concatenation method. Cross-crop, cross-site, and cross-year generalization experiments further show that risk accuracy remains above 0.84 with stable recognition performance under significant distribution shifts. Ablation studies verify the synergistic contributions of the proposed core modules to overall performance improvement. The results indicate that the proposed framework enables the transition from single recognition to risk-driven plant protection decision-making, providing a technically viable pathway for pest diagnosis and control strategy optimization in fruit and vegetable horticulture.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e320af40886becb653fc26https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12040486
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper