PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics0 citations

Comparative Numerical Analysis of Energy Absorption in Semi-concave reentrant, Hexagonal, and Trapezoidal Auxetic Cores

View Full Paper
MCMuse Degefe ChewakaLHLinchun HeJLJincheng Lei

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the energy absorption capabilities of different auxetic core structures.
  • Introduced semi–concave reentrant auxetic metamaterial along with trapezoidal and hexagonal architectures.
  • Investigated mechanical behavior using theoretical derivation based on Castigliano’s theorem.
  • Conducted finite element simulations to evaluate compressive response and energy absorption.
  • Established geometric relationships and relative densities of various lattice types.
  • Trapezoidal lattices showed the highest specific energy absorption and peak force under in-plane compression.
  • In out-of-plane compression, trapezoidal and hexagonal lattices absorbed 85.7% and 80.3% of energy, respectively.
  • SCR demonstrated lower energy absorption compared to trapezoidal and hexagonal configurations.
  • Trapezoidal lattice achieved 89% out-of-plane and 70% in-plane energy efficiency.

Abstract

This work introduces a semi–concave reentrant (SCR) auxetic metamaterial, alongside trapezoidal and hexagonal honeycomb architectures, designed through systematic lattice configuration and geometric parametric control, and subsequently extended into sandwich panel structures. Initially, the mechanical behavior of the unit-cell was investigated through theoretical derivation using Castigliano’s second theorem, providing foundational insight into deformation mechanisms and energy absorption potential. Building on this theoretical framework, detailed finite element simulations were performed on larger lattice assemblies to evaluate their compressive response, deformation patterns, and energy absorption characteristics under both in-plane and out-of-plane loading. The transition from conventional hexagonal topology to SCR geometry was achieved by introducing inward-inclined cell edges, effectively producing a semi–concave auxetic configuration. Geometric relationships and relative densities of each lattice type were systematically established. Simulation results indicate that trapezoidal lattices exhibit the highest specific energy absorption and peak force under in-plane compression, outperforming SCR and hexagonal lattices. For out-of-plane compression, trapezoidal and hexagonal lattices absorbed 85.7% and 80.3% of the energy, respectively, whereas SCR exhibited comparatively lower absorption. The trapezoidal configuration demonstrates excellent mechanical stability and energy efficiency, achieving 89% out-of-plane and 70% in-plane efficiency, highlighting its suitability for impact mitigation and crashworthiness applications. These findings confirm that integrating theoretical derivation with large-scale simulations provides a robust framework for evaluating lattice architectures, and support the selection of trapezoidal and semi–concave reentrant lattices for lightweight, energy-absorbing structural designs in automotive, aerospace, and protective equipment applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chewaka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e320e740886becb65400bbhttps://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455427503913
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper