PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026BMC Medical Ethics0 citationsOpen Access

Determinants of willingness to share personal genomic data: a systematic review focused on health literacy

MSMarleen SchmeissRSRenate Schramek

Key Points

  • This review aims to identify factors that influence patients' willingness to share genomic and medical data, focusing on health literacy.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies from 2015 to 2025.
  • Included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies on genomic data sharing and understanding.
  • Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis.
  • Participants generally understood basic genetic terms but lacked knowledge about data infrastructures.
  • Trust significantly influenced data-sharing willingness, often compensating for low genomic literacy.
  • Moral and altruistic motives were common drivers for participation, while financial considerations were less significant.

Abstract

Abstract Background Genomic medicine increasingly depends on patients’ willingness to share genomic and medical data. While data sharing supports advances in personalised care, it also raises ethical and social concerns related to privacy, trust and participation. Understanding these factors requires attention to patients’ health literacy and their capacity to interpret and act upon genomic information. Methods A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 that explored patients’ understanding of genomic information and their willingness to share data. Searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. Eligible studies included qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods designs. Findings were synthesised thematically and Nutbeam’s model of health literacy was used in the discussion to interpret the results. Results Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Participants demonstrated basic understanding of genetic terms but limited knowledge of data infrastructures and governance. Trust was a central factor influencing willingness to share data, often compensating for limited genomic literacy. Moral and altruistic motives encouraged engagement, whereas financial considerations played a minor, context-dependent role. Conclusions Data sharing in genomic medicine relies on more than factual knowledge. Strengthening health literacy through transparent, dialogue-based, and participatory approaches can promote informed, autonomous, and ethically responsible participation in genomic research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schmeiss et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e320fd40886becb6540215https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01456-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper