PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026World Journal of Surgical Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Predictive value of PD-L1 expression and dMMR/pMMR status for immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis

LLLifang LanZTZhuangyan Tang姚姚雄伟

Key Points

  • This analysis investigates the predictive significance of PD-L1 expression and dMMR/pMMR status on survival outcomes for advanced endometrial cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
  • Included five RCTs involving 2,707 patients.
  • Searched four databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.
  • Synthesized progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data as hazard ratios (HRs) with confidence intervals (CIs).
  • ICI combined with chemotherapy significantly improved PFS across all subgroups: dMMR, pMMR, and different PD-L1 statuses.
  • Significant OS benefits were observed only in the dMMR subgroup.
  • No OS improvement was noted in pMMR patients.
  • PD-L1 expression did not affect progression-free survival outcomes.
  • The results highlight the predictive value of MMR status for treatment efficacy.

Abstract

Advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) poses a significant therapeutic challenge. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with chemotherapy (CT) represents a promising first-line approach, yet the predictive value of deficient/proficient mismatch repair (dMMR/pMMR) status and PD-L1 expression in therapeutic efficacy remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the predictive value of dMMR/pMMR status and PD-L1 expression for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced/recurrent EC treated with ICI + CT. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) was performed. PFS and OS were synthesized as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Review Manager 5.4. Five RCTs (2,707 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with CT alone, ICI + CT significantly improved PFS in all subgroups: dMMR (HR = 0.36, 95% CI:0.28–0.45, P < 0.00001), pMMR (HR = 0.78, 95% CI:0.70–0.87, P = 0.009), PD-L1-positive (HR = 0.52, 95% CI:0.38–0.70, P < 0.0001), and PD-L1-negative (HR = 0.66, 95% CI:0.44–0.98, P = 0.04). For OS, only the dMMR subgroup showed a significant benefit (HR = 0.41, 95% CI:0.28–0.61, P < 0.00001), with no improvement observed in pMMR patients (HR = 0.88, 95% CI:0.73–1.07, P = 0.20). For advanced/recurrent EC, ICI + CT enhanced PFS across dMMR/pMMR and PD-L1 expression subgroups, with OS benefit apparently confined to dMMR patients and not observed in pMMR patients. These results present the clinically valuable predictive value of MMR status for ICI + CT efficacy and suggest that PD-L1expression did not influence the benefit of ICI on patient PFS, which deserve high clinical attention. https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2026-03-0015/, identifier INPLASY202630015.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e320fd40886becb65402d9https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04330-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper