PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

Preoperative (Neoadjuvant) Combined Chemoradiotherapy in the Management of Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Retrospective Study

View Full Paper
BSBrittany L. SiontisGSGeorgios M. StergiopoulosJTJudith Jebastin Thangaiah

Key Points

  • This study examines the effectiveness of preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy in localized soft tissue sarcoma and its impact on survival outcomes.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis at Mayo Clinic on patients with localized STS.
  • Utilized mitomycin, cisplatin, and doxorubicin (MitoAP) with concurrent radiotherapy.
  • Analyzed data from patients treated between 1985 and 2019.
  • Determined disease-specific survival and tumor viability.
  • Identified 179 patients with a median age of 58 years and a median tumor size of 9.5 cm.
  • 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 77.9%.
  • Adding perioperative chemotherapy was associated with improved DSS (HR: 0.48).
  • Median post-CCRT tumor viability was 30%, varying significantly by histology.

Abstract

Background: Localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is primarily treated with surgical resection with or without radiotherapy (RT), while the role of chemotherapy (CT) as a radiosensitizer remains unclear. We report our single-institution experience with combined chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in treating localized STS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with localized STS treated at Mayo Clinic with mitomycin, cisplatin, and doxorubicin (MitoAP) concurrently with RT between 1/1/85 and 12/12/19. Results: We identified 179 patients (median age 58 years; median tumor size 9.5 cm), with 83.8% of tumors located in the extremities or trunk. Among them, 77.1% received perioperative CT in addition to CCRT, with 95% of those treated in the neoadjuvant setting. Median RT dose was 50 Gray. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 77.9% (95% confidence interval, CI: 70.8–83.4%). The addition of perioperative CT to CCRT was associated with improved DSS compared with CCRT alone (p = 0.01, Hazard Ratio, HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27–0.85). Median post-CCRT tumor viability was 30% and did not differ by CT use (p = 0.39), but varied significantly by histology (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our institutional protocol utilizing two cycles of MitoAP with RT was well tolerated. DSS in our cohort was similar to historical data using perioperative RT alone, suggesting no clear benefit from CCRT. However, the majority of patients in our cohort were classified as high risk, which may have attenuated a potential survival benefit in the absence of appropriate comparative controls. Furthermore, additional perioperative CT to CCRT was associated with improved DSS and differential histology-specific responses in tumor viability, suggesting that a more aggressive neoadjuvant and perioperative approach may be beneficial in selected patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Siontis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3211640886becb6540405https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18081260
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper