PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Archaeological Dialogues0 citationsOpen Access

Destruction as creation: modes of intra-active becoming in a created and built world

View Full Paper
SSStefan SchreiberGoethe University FrankfurtLRLea Rees

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore destruction and creation as complementary processes of transformation rather than oppositional forces.
  • Presented a provocative perspective on destruction and creation.
  • Engaged with archaeological discourses through a posthumanist lens.
  • Interpreted actions of destruction and creation using agential realism.
  • Proposed that destruction leads to new possibilities alongside creation.
  • Highlighted the continuous nature of transformation in built environments.

Abstract

Abstract This provocation seeks to stimulate discussion by highlighting an alternative way of looking at the actions of destruction and creation, not as opposing forces but as an ongoing process of transformation. Destruction encompasses a variety of material and symbolic transformations, which go hand in hand with the creation of new possibilities. Therefore, destruction is not an antagonism to creation but – following Karen Barad’s agential realism – a mode of intra-active becoming. Far from being a theory in its own right, this paper presents a perspective that opens up the possibility of encountering archaeological discourses of destruction and creation from a posthumanist lens.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schreiber et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3213840886becb654066fhttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1380203826100269
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper