PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Speciation-dependent molecular mechanism of electron transfer from the c -type cytochrome MtrC to U(VI)-ligand complexes

MMMargaux MolinasKMKarin Lederballe MeibomABAshley Brown

Key Points

  • This research aims to elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind electron transfer from the c-type cytochrome MtrC to U(VI)-ligand complexes.
  • Investigated kinetics of U(VI) reduction using S. baltica MtrC in solution with various ligands.
  • Examined interactions between MtrC and U(VI) complexes using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy.
  • Utilized M4-edge High Resolution X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure spectroscopy to analyze bonding types.
  • Identified two reaction rates for U(VI) complexed with different ligands.
  • Faster rates observed for U-citrate, U-NTA, and U-EDTA compared to U-carbonate and U-hydroxo.
  • Differentiated electron transfer mechanisms based on ligand interactions with MtrC, including electrostatic, hydrogen bonding, and covalent interactions.

Abstract

Members of the Shewanella genus transfer electrons to metal and actinide electron acceptors such as hexavalent uranium, U(VI), via c-type cytochromes. The intracellular mechanism of electron transfer is well studied but the delivery of electrons to external electron acceptors less well so. MtrC, a decaheme c-type cytochrome located on the cell surface side of the outer membrane of many Shewanella species, and extending to the extracellular medium, transfers electrons to U(VI), both in vivo and in vitro when purified. However, it is unclear how the electron transfer between the terminal heme(s) of the protein and extracellular U(VI) occurs. In particular, the type of interaction between MtrC and U(VI), and the parameters controlling electron transfer remain to be elucidated. Here, we investigated the kinetics of U(VI) reduction by S. baltica MtrC in solution for U(VI) complexed with one of five ligands: carbonate, hydroxyl, citrate, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). We observed two initial reaction rates, one more rapid for U-citrate, U-NTA and U-EDTA, and another slower for U-carbonate and U-hydroxo. By combining Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy and M4-edge High Resolution X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure spectroscopy, we attributed these differences to the type of interaction between the U-ligand complex and MtrC, i.e., probably electrostatic interaction with the ligand of U-EDTA, hydrogen bonding to the ligand of U-citrate and U-NTA, and covalent bonding with U-carbonate and U-hydroxo. We also demonstrate the persistence of U(V) in the U-carbonate system when interacting with MtrC. Overall, we showed that the mechanism of electron transfer depended on the chemistry of the soluble U(VI) complex serving as the substrate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Molinas et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3213840886becb6540705https://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000178791
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nitrate and iron salts enhanced Shewanella MR-1 bioreduction on Cr(VI) by stimulating cytochrome c electron transmission system2026
  2. 2Adsorption and Electron Transfer of Metal-Reducing Decaheme Cytochrome Protein Mtrf on Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Surfaces2025
  3. 3The isotopic signature of UV during bacterial reduction2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Overlap and differences between the inward and outward electron transfer pathways in Shewanella oneidensis2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Fenton-Like Reaction-Driven Intrinsic Electron Transfer in Metal–Organic Complex Molecular Reactors for Photocatalytic Uranium Removal2025