PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Human Development0 citations

Does Practical Wisdom Solve the Moral Knowledge-Action Gap?

View Full Paper
WSWouter Sanderse

Key Points

  • The research investigates how Aristotelian practical wisdom can bridge the gap between moral knowledge and action.
  • Analysis of the neo-Aristotelian Phronesis Model and its claims
  • Critical review of Aristotle's writings on practical wisdom
  • Exploration of interpretive, collective, and political dimensions of moral decisions
  • The APM is shown to reinterpret phronesis with an action component.
  • Revisiting Aristotle reveals unintegrated resources valuable for the APM.
  • Interpretive and collective aspects of wisdom are crucial for understanding moral actions.

Abstract

This paper examines the Aristotelian foundations of the neo-Aristotelian Phronesis Model (APM) (Darnell et al., 2019; Kristjánsson & Fowers, 2024) in light of its claim to resolve the moral knowledge-action gap. The paper argues that the APM departs from Aristotle’s moral psychology by construing phronesis as having an action component. On Aristotle’s account, practical wisdom culminates in prohairesis (reasoned choice or decision), not necessarily in action itself. Rather than rejecting the APM, the paper shows that Aristotle’s own conception of phronesis offers other resources, some of which are acknowledged by proponents of the APM but not integrated into the model. Revisiting Aristotle’s writings brings into view the interpretive, collective, and political dimensions of practical wisdom. These factors help to understand better how wise moral decisions may, or may not, be enacted in concrete social contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wouter Sanderse (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3215140886becb654082ahttps://doi.org/10.1159/000551960
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper