PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Health Promotion International0 citations

Engaging youth in systems thinking for active recreation: piloting a Collective Intelligence approach

View Full Paper
JMJiani MaDCDavid CaoMHMichael Hogan

Key Points

  • This research aimed to engage youth in identifying barriers to active recreation through a Collective Intelligence approach.
  • Conducted three Collective Intelligence workshops in Victoria, Australia.
  • Engaged nine participants aged 12-17 to identify barriers and co-create solutions.
  • Facilitated discussions to generate and prioritize barriers and design solutions.
  • Identified 48 barriers grouped into eight categories including shyness, lack of support, and safety.
  • Developed individual, community, and government-level strategies for enhancing active recreation.
  • Highlighted strengths of the Collective Intelligence approach and identified challenges in youth engagement processes.

Abstract

Youth active recreation is influenced by complex interactions among factors in the active recreation system. Systems approaches can help identify ways to intervene; however, young people are rarely involved in this process. This study piloted the use of Collective Intelligence (CI), a participatory systems approach, to engage young people in identifying barriers to active recreation and co-creating solutions. Three CI workshops were conducted in Victoria, Australia, involving nine participants aged 12-17. In each workshop, participants generated and prioritized barriers, co-created systems maps, and collaboratively designed solutions aligned to the mapped systems. Field notes captured reflections on facilitation and youth engagement. Across workshops, 48 barriers were identified and grouped into eight categories: Shyness and social skills, Lack of support, Financial, Time, Space and equipment, Public Transport, Safety, and Medical. Participants then co-created solutions across individual (n = 5), community (n = 11), and government (n = 5) levels. Individual-level strategies focused on enhancing social skills; community-level ideas focused on public transport and inclusive spaces; Government actions included subsidies for extracurricular activities. Reflections highlight the value of CI to engage young people in articulating interconnected influences in their lived experience with active recreation. Key strengths of the process included making complexity visible and actionable. Challenges included uncertainty of upstream issues, uneven participant engagement, conflation of terms, and maintaining focus. This study offers actionable strategies to potentially overcome these challenges for anyone who wants to engage young people in systems thinking. The inclusion of a youth researcher was valuable in supporting young people to contribute their ideas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3215140886becb6540907https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daag049
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper