PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Advanced Science1 citationsOpen Access

Phase Fraction Modulation Enhances Li + /Na + Diffusion Disparity in Spent LiFePO 4 Cathodes for Efficient Lithium Extraction from Brine

View Full Paper
RYRuiqi YinQHQihan HUANGJHJiayu Hao

Key Points

  • The aim is to improve lithium extraction from spent LiFePO4 by modulating phase fractions within the lattice.
  • Applied phase fraction modulation to the LiFePO4 lattice for lithium extraction.
  • Regulated oxidant dosage within a pH-maintained reversible phase transition framework.
  • Analyzed diffusion energy barriers for Li+ and Na+ during (de)intercalation.
  • Achieved maximum lithium recovery rate of 99% within 40 minutes.
  • Improved structure stability with only 0.27% and 0.58% dissolution loss of Fe and P atoms, respectively.
  • Economic analysis showed a 528% increase in profit and significant reductions in energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Traditional spent LiFePO 4 (SLFP) recycling faces challenges such as high energy consumption, environmental pollution, and low profitability. A novel direct cascaded utilization strategy was proposed for SLFP, where phase fraction modulation in the SLFP lattice enabled efficient lithium extraction from secondary‐treated lithium‐containing brine. The approach precisely controlled LiFePO 4 phase (x in Li x FePO 4) by regulating the oxidant dosage within a pH‐maintained reversible phase transition framework. Moreover, the contraction of the crystal structure and the amplified disparity in Li + /Na + diffusion energy barriers synergistically improve structure stability and ion selectivity. The Li + /Na + diffusion energy barrier difference was up to 0. 56 eV. During the (de) intercalation process, Li 0. 19 FePO 4 exhibited excellent structure stability and Li/Na separation capability. The dissolution loss rates of Fe and P atoms were only 0. 27% and 0. 58%. And the maximum Li + recovery rate can reach 99% within 40 min. Furthermore, the economic and environmental analysis indicated that the new strategy yields 528% higher profit (7. 23 per kg of SLFP), 40. 5% reduction in energy demand and 67. 8% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to conventional pyrometallurgy. It bypasses the need for pre‐sorting SLFP, enhancing SLFP recycling efficiency and promoting high‐value use of lithium‐containing brine through “urban mining”.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3216540886becb6540a38https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.75320
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Room‐Temperature Lithium‐Restocking Strategy for the Direct Reuse of Degraded LiFePO 4 Electrodes2024 · 53 citations
  2. 2Comprehensive Technology for Recycling and Regenerating Materials from Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery2024 · 157 citations
  3. 3Thermally modulated lithium iron phosphate batteries for mass-market electric vehicles2021 · 583 citations
  4. 4Phase Transitions and Physical Properties of the Mixed Valence Iron Phosphate Fe3(PO3OH)4(H2O)42022 · 3 citations
  5. 5Water-Based Electrode Manufacturing and Direct Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes—A Green and Sustainable Manufacturing System2020 · 157 citations