PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026GRURRR. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Rechtsprechungs-Report/GRUR-DVD/GRUR-CD/IIC/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil0 citationsOpen Access

Circular by Design? Rethinking Trade Secret Protection and Data Governance in the EU Circular Economy

MMMaria Lillà MontagnaniLZLaura Zoboli

Key Points

  • Examine the misalignment between environmental policy and intellectual property rights in the circular economy.
  • Analyzed existing EU regulations like the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and the Right to Repair Directive.
  • Investigated the impact of trade secret protection on circular practices such as repair and reuse.
  • Proposed frameworks for aligning IPR reforms with data governance for enhanced circularity.
  • Identified trade secret protection as a barrier to sharing critical information for the circular economy.
  • Demonstrated that current IPR frameworks conflict with EU's objectives for sustainability and resource efficiency.
  • Proposed a shift from exclusivity to openness could facilitate improved collaboration among stakeholders.

Abstract

Abstract The European Union has embraced the circular economy as a cornerstone of its transition toward climate neutrality and long-term resource efficiency. This paper, however, argues that the promise of circularity is undermined by the structural misalignment between environmental policy objectives and the legal frameworks governing intellectual property rights (IPRs) and data governance. While recent measures such as the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), the Right to Repair Directive (R2R), and the Data Act introduce mechanisms for data sharing, design transparency, and repairability, their effectiveness is constrained by entrenched logics of exclusivity and secrecy. In particular, trade secret protection – potentially indefinite and broadly defined – remains a systemic barrier to information flows that are indispensable for repair, reuse, remanufacturing, and interoperability. The paper advances the concepts of “circular IPRs” and “circular data” to reframe these regimes as mutually reinforcing pillars of a legal order capable of sustaining circularity. It contends that realizing the EU’s circular ambitions requires a paradigm shift: from exclusivity and secrecy toward openness and collaboration and from proprietary control toward infrastructural access and circularity. By aligning IPR reform and data regulation around openness, collaboration, and ecological imperatives, the EU can build the legal foundations for truly circular innovation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Montagnani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3216540886becb6540a5chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-026-01709-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper