PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Frontiers in Psychiatry1 citationsOpen Access

Healthcare professionals’ perspectives and/or experiences of digital mental health tools in clinical practice: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

View Full Paper
CMClaudia MartinGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustEEEmily EisnerAWAnja WittkowskiGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize healthcare professionals' perspectives on digital mental health tools in clinical practice.
  • Conducted a systematic search of mixed-method and qualitative studies across five databases.
  • Quality assessment of eligible studies was performed.
  • Data were analyzed using inductive thematic synthesis.
  • Fifteen studies were reviewed, involving 604 healthcare professionals.
  • Four main themes regarding digital mental health tools were identified.
  • Most healthcare professionals believed DMHTs should enhance face-to-face care, rather than replace it;
  • Concerns were raised regarding therapeutic quality, risk management, and increased workload.

Abstract

Background Mental health difficulties are highly prevalent worldwide. Digital mental health tools (DMHTs) have been developed to increase accessibility to mental healthcare for people who may struggle to access care due to cost, location or stigma. As the views of stakeholders are important in understanding the potential barriers to and facilitators of DMHT implementation, the aims of this review were to critically appraise and synthesise qualitative findings relating to the perceptions and/or experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the use of digital mental health tools in clinical practice. Method A systematic search of mixed-method and qualitative studies was performed using five databases. Eligible studies were quality-assessed. Data were analysed using inductive thematic synthesis. Results Fifteen studies were identified and reviewed. Four main themes (alongside eight subthemes) were developed from the data of 604 HCPs: 1) DMHTs should augment – not replace – face-to-face clinical care; 2) Considerations and caveats to use in clinical practice; 3) Using DMHTs to enhance clinical care; and 4) Perceived barriers and concerns. Conclusion HCPs strongly endorsed the view that DMHTs offer increased access to care, however, concerns about their therapeutic quality, risk management, and workload burden persist. Context-sensitive implementation and proper infrastructure are essential for successful integration into mental health services. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD42020188879.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e4702d010ef96374d8d611https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1743614
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper