PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026OR Spectrum1 citationsOpen Access

Original performance measures for efficiency analysis and essential assumptions for benchmarking when applying the DEA methodology

View Full Paper
HDHarald Dyckhoff

Key Points

  • The research examines the nature of data envelopment analysis and its role in efficiency measurement.
  • Systematic examination of DEA foundations
  • Analysis within decision and production theory frameworks
  • Exploration of performance measures and assumptions for benchmarking
  • Propositions for advancing DEA methodology
  • Clarifications on treating pollutants in DEA
  • Insights into the multidimensional aspects of efficiency measurement

Abstract

The following questions, which are of fundamental importance for data envelopment analysis (DEA) and, to some extent, for efficiency measurement in general, are examined: Is DEA a general “multiple-criteria evaluation methodology” or a specific methodology for analysing the efficiency of production processes? What performance measures are original to any efficiency analysis? What assumptions are essential for a reasonable benchmarking when applying the DEA methodology? These questions have not yet been answered conclusively. The article provides some answers by systematically examining DEA’s foundations as a kind of multidimensional cost-benefit analysis within a general framework of decision and production theory. The findings enable propositions to be derived that contribute to advancing the DEA methodology and to its meaningful and useful empirical and practical application. For instance, it justifies how pollutants and disposability properties can be treated in DEA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harald Dyckhoff (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e47193010ef96374d8de2dhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-026-00851-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review2009 · 2,186 citations
  2. 2A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research2007 · 7,611 citations
  3. 3Joint Production and Responsibility in Ecological Economics2006 · 38 citations
  4. 4Interne Unternehmensrechnung2014 · 94 citations
  5. 5Design Science in Information Systems Research12004 · 10,408 citations