PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026International Journal of Ethics Education3 citationsOpen Access

Ethical issues in medical AI education: challenges and prospects

CZChuansheng ZhengHZHaitao Zhang

Key Points

  • The central aim is to identify gaps in AI ethics education within medical curricula and propose a comprehensive framework.
  • Conducted a scoping review of 26 articles focused on AI ethics in medical education.
  • Analyzed additional literature to contextualize findings.
  • Critiqued existing educational approaches to AI ethics.
  • Identified critical ethical challenges including algorithmic bias and accountability.
  • Highlighted the inadequacy of current AI ethics education frameworks.
  • Proposed a transformative, interdisciplinary educational approach within the medical curriculum.

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice presents a paradigm shift in healthcare, necessitating a parallel evolution in medical education. While current curricula increasingly address the technical functionalities of AI, a critical gap remains in the systematic education of medical students and professionals on the profound ethical implications of these technologies. Given this, we screened out research articles published in recent years on the ethical issues of AI in medical education, resulting in a total of 26 papers. We conducted a scoping review of these 26 articles along with other relevant literature. This review argues that the failure to embed robust, critical, and nuanced AI ethics education within medical training is not merely an academic oversight but an impending catalyst for ethical crises in clinical care. It delineates the core ethical challenges—including algorithmic bias, opacity (“black box” problem), accountability, data privacy, and the erosion of professional autonomy—and critiques the prevailing, often superficial, approaches to teaching them. The review further proposes a transformative educational framework that moves beyond simplistic ethics modules towards a pervasive, interdisciplinary, and case-based integration of AI ethics across the entire medical curriculum. This approach aims to cultivate a generation of “digitally literate physicians” who are not passive consumers of AI outputs but critical, empowered, and ethically discerning partners in the age of intelligent medicine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e47193010ef96374d8defbhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-026-00241-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Perceptions of large language models in medical education and clinical practice among pediatric emergency physicians in Saudi Arabia: a multiregional cross-sectional study2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2Can we open the black box of AI?2016 · 1,752 citations
  3. 3Exploring the Performance of ChatGPT-4 in the Taiwan Audiologist Qualification Examination: Preliminary Observational Study Highlighting the Potential of AI Chatbots in Hearing Care2024 · 23 citations
  4. 4Perception of Medical Undergraduates on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Qualitative Exploration2025 · 12 citations
  5. 5Exploring Undergraduate Medical Students' Perspectives towards Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Qualitative Study from India2025 · 8 citations