PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion0 citationsOpen Access

Who Is (Not) Afraid of Immigration? A Mediation Analysis Into the Ambivalence of Christian Religiosity for Immigration‐Related Attitudes

View Full Paper
FRFelix Roleder

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate how Christian religiosity affects attitudes toward immigration in Germany through various mediators.
  • Utilized representative data from ALLBUS 2023
  • Conducted four mediation models
  • Examined distinct functions of religion: economic, value-based, and social
  • Identified pathways linking religiosity to immigration attitudes
  • Religious optimism reduces perceptions of economic conflict related to immigration
  • Nonfundamentalist religiosity promotes pro-immigration attitudes through values of diversity and tolerance
  • Outgroup contact decreases cultural distancing from immigrant groups
  • Religious fundamentalism increases social and cultural distancing from immigrants

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article systematically investigates the mediators linking Christian religiosity to immigration‐related attitudes in Germany. On the basis of current, representative data (ALLBUS 2023), four mediation models reveal multiple pathways through which religiosity shapes such attitudes. These pathways correspond to three distinct functions of religion: economic, value‐based, and social. Specifically, religious optimism mitigates perceptions of economic conflict over immigration. Nonfundamentalist religiosity encourages pro‐immigration attitudes through concern for diversity, tolerance, and prosociality. In addition, outgroup contact, encouraged by nonfundamentalist religiosity, reduces cultural distancing from immigrant groups. In contrast, religious fundamentalism reinforces social and cultural distancing. By identifying new mediators and refining the modeling of established ones, the study advances our understanding of the complex and ambivalent significance of Christian religiosity in shaping immigration‐related attitudes. The mediators examined reflect fundamental functions of religion that extend beyond the German context, suggesting that the proposed model has broader international relevance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Felix Roleder (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e471ef010ef96374d8e1b4https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70061
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Attitudes toward refugees between group-focused enmity and other-oriented responsiveness: Evidence from nationally representative German samples 2015/2016 and 20222024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Borders of Compassion: Immigration Preferences and Parochial Altruism2020 · 68 citations
  3. 3Religion und Sozialkapital2018 · 24 citations
  4. 4Prosociality and religion2020 · 51 citations
  5. 5Consequences of Diversity for Social Cohesion and Prejudice: The Missing Dimension of Intergroup Contact2015 · 185 citations